From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RZopV-00069J-A7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:12:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7702321C322; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from taliesin.riddlemaster.org (riddlemaster.org [209.170.146.89]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B531B21C312 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kushiel ([192.168.2.13] helo=kushiel.localnet) by taliesin.riddlemaster.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RZoip-0004wU-LH for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:06:03 -0500 From: Daniel D Jones To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDEPIM-4.7.3 hits the stable tree ... brrrrr! Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:06:03 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.0.6-gentoo; KDE/4.7.3; i686; ; ) References: <201112071912.23133.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201112111406.03823.ddjones@riddlemaster.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spam_score_int: -9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "taliesin.riddlemaster.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thursday, December 08, 2011 11:26:27 Dương "Yang" ヤン Hà Nguyễn wrote: > Just to share my short story today. And I think KDEPIM should *not* > be marked as stable at the moment. I think if they work really hard for the next three or four months they might be able to get it into a state where it could be considered alpha quality. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP X-Archives-Salt: 40d87a48-20c5-4d04-ae02-df10cf037fba X-Archives-Hash: d6285b838392051f431565bb239906da On Thursday, December 08, 2011 11:26:27 D=C6=B0=C6=A1ng "Yang" =E3=83=A4=E3= =83=B3 H=C3=A0 Nguy=E1=BB=85n wrote: > Just to share my short story today. And I think KDEPIM should *not* > be marked as stable at the moment. I think if they work really hard for the next three or four months they mig= ht=20 be able to get it into a state where it could be considered alpha quality. =2D-=20 "Just the omission of Jane Austen's books alone would make a fairly good=20 library out of a library that hadn't a book in it." - Mark Twain