From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RZWOx-00068V-Ex for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 23:32:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF1F721C04B; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 23:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DA7E21C04B for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 23:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2011 23:31:08 -0000 Received: from roam74.rz.tu-ilmenau.de (EHLO localhost) [141.24.10.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 11 Dec 2011 00:31:08 +0100 X-Authenticated: #4040096 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18TemAEy+MT6kYp3iw8Lbqa3i12nzxO6lRgX4veNT HkhNwvM69+jqee Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:31:07 +0100 From: Frank Steinmetzger To: Gentoo-Users Mailinglist Subject: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick and Graphicsmagick blocking each other Message-ID: <20111210233107.GE5966@eisen.lan> Mail-Followup-To: Frank Steinmetzger , Gentoo-Users Mailinglist Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="brEuL7wsLY8+TuWz" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt 1.5.21 (2010-09-15, Gentoo 1.5.21-r1) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: 7da95a86-2b10-4f67-96aa-d11c874afe44 X-Archives-Hash: e8b785c0082b11d1093c26fa575c2894 --brEuL7wsLY8+TuWz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, a number of packages depend on imagemagick, such as Inkscape, Frescobaldi a= nd some LaTeX related stuff. I wanted to take a look at Octave, but this positively wants graphicsmagick, which is a fork of imagemagick as far as I= can tell and which conflicts with imagemagick. Now some of the named packages can use graphicsmagick, it just comes last in the ebuild=E2=80=99s order of dependencies, but some others can=E2=80=99t. = D=E2=80=99ya think this is worthy of a bug report, since graphicsmagick even has an imagemagick usefla= g? Perhaps this could be converted into a virtual to make this easier on a glo= bal scale. Or would it be too much dependent upon the individual package? I don=E2=80= =99t know anything about graphicsmagick really, or its kind of compatibility implementation. Cheers --=20 Gru=C3=9F | Greetings | Qapla' I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services. =E2=80=9CWe all know Linux is great =E2=80=A6 it does infinite loops in 5 s= econds.=E2=80=9D =E2=80=93 Linus Torvalds --brEuL7wsLY8+TuWz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7j67oACgkQGafpl66MV0yyPACgltGI+mC8XYmFpS6pIJmJZth3 0FcAn29oVr3vkO3ZMtIarT4xze+XO8X2 =4GZw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --brEuL7wsLY8+TuWz--