From: "Walter Dnes" <waltdnes@waltdnes.org>
To: Gentoo Users List <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-user] "We've already been run in this tree;" error world.
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 04:27:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111209092732.GA24071@waltdnes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111125072059.GA13496@waltdnes.org>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:20:59AM -0500, waltdnes@waltdnes.org wrote
> I just ran a sync and update on my laptop. The builds for...
>
> gnome-extra/libgsf-1.14.21
> x11-libs/gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0-r1
> gnome-base/librsvg-2.34.1-r1
> www-client/firefox-7.0.1-r1
> app-text/ghostscript-gpl-9.04-r4
> app-office/abiword-2.8.6-r1
>
> ...all came up with the same warning in /var/log/portage/elog
>
> WARN: prepare
> We've already been run in this tree; you should
> avoid this if possible (perhaps by filing a bug)
Somedays my Google-fu is better than others. Today I ran into the
same error, and managed to find a discussion on the mailing list...
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/242435?do=post_view_flat#
vapier says...
> it seems we have some cases where eclasses/ebuilds interact
> poorly. for example, if an eclass runs eautoreconf or elibtoolize, and
> then the ebuild does some stuff where it ends up running eautoreconf,
> subsequent elibtoolize calls are skipped.
>
> this means that the work done by the earlier elibtoolize call was all
> for naught, as eautoreconf blows all of its work away be regenerating
> the files elibtoolize patched. and when eautoreconf attempts to run
> elibtoolize itself, we don't get all the fun patches since elibtoolize
> detected it was run already.
>
> rather than have this continue to silently ignore the issue, i'm
> thinking of making these changes:
> - elibtoolize now has a --force flag
> - eautoreconf always calls elibtoolize with --force
> - if elibtoolize detects a previous run with --force, it warns, but runs
> this way we complain, but at least we continue to work
In a later message in that same thread he says...
> yes, but the current state is that people don't notice and things
> silently break. i'm turning the situation into a QA warning so bug
> reports get filed/fixed, and things continue to work in the mean time.
I appended my info to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391749
--
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-09 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-25 7:20 [gentoo-user] Error message for several ebuilds when updating world waltdnes
2011-11-25 7:31 ` Dale
2011-11-25 19:45 ` Walter Dnes
2011-11-25 20:27 ` Dale
2011-11-25 21:58 ` Walter Dnes
2011-11-25 22:28 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-12-09 9:27 ` Walter Dnes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111209092732.GA24071@waltdnes.org \
--to=waltdnes@waltdnes.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox