From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-132141-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1RYFDF-0002WV-3S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:58:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 080B821C2BD; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C1121C2AD for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6682B80457 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:56:39 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:56:37 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse Message-ID: <20111207105637.1546f12f@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20111207123222.40e63be2@rohan.example.com> References: <i4Nb3-4Q0-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <i4Nb3-4Q0-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <i4NkK-54g-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <i4QiC-1Co-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <i50UG-2Gr-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <i51e2-3of-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <i5bn4-3UE-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <i5cM9-69c-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <20111207001508.GA15904@gaurahari.merseine.nu> <4EDF2D47.9020105@alstadheim.priv.no> <20111207123222.40e63be2@rohan.example.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10cvs103 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/utM71xMAbv8RbvMkFQXEeN9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 0b2475ed-beff-4856-833d-3cf1dda36342 X-Archives-Hash: f6d2a828d52b0fd7f301f7c34bdc2cad --Sig_/utM71xMAbv8RbvMkFQXEeN9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 12:32:22 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > The fellow who sits two desks away from me reckons he's lost count of > the number of times Google finds the exact answer he's looking for in a > post to gentoo-user :-) Wouldn't it be quicker to just ask you? ;-) --=20 Neil Bothwick If you consult enough experts, you can confirm any opinion. --Sig_/utM71xMAbv8RbvMkFQXEeN9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7fRmYACgkQum4al0N1GQOKjwCgpp0feNutp6op8eN6k68ZP+gZ p0oAnRYj2/H5zTSLzAoSOWcswKuNjd1O =j49l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/utM71xMAbv8RbvMkFQXEeN9--