From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RWcUW-00015G-L8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:26:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEC2921C0A8; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 23:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A801521C0A8 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 23:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A080E8045B for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 23:24:35 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 23:24:29 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Full disk encryption Message-ID: <20111202232429.6d6a1a4b@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20111202220018.121ac10d@karnak.local> References: <20111130152753.176a9a08@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <4ED67664.1060302@gmail.com> <20111130202828.34f30c74@karnak.local> <20111130214733.19888eb1@digimed.co.uk> <20111130220735.5105ba14@karnak.local> <20111130232656.45b21f47@digimed.co.uk> <20111201002706.5a77f2fd@karnak.local> <20111201084727.3076a3a9@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <20111201134301.662c7899@memphis.local> <20111201140318.1b118a3e@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <20111202220018.121ac10d@karnak.local> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10cvs103 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/2lWbsDISbUpQNbOE/BNjuep"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 7b39375a-cd03-409a-aee6-a703e2d35679 X-Archives-Hash: bd84a948af90b40749ae8d9b94e24d18 --Sig_/2lWbsDISbUpQNbOE/BNjuep Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 22:00:18 +0000, David W Noon wrote: > > Now it makes sense, but can't you use busybox fsck? =20 >=20 > AFAIAA, busybox does not have an fsck command. If it did, it would > only be a transparent loader for filesystem-specific programs, such as > e2fsck or reiserfsck; this is how the standard fsck program works too. Busybox does have an fsck, it doesn't recognise the filesystem type, you have to give it as an argument. A quick Google suggest that it does indeed pass the work on to e2fsck, however, I tried renaming /sbin/e2fsck and then running "busybox fsck -t ext2 /dev/summat" and it worked. --=20 Neil Bothwick Copy from another: plagiarism. Copy from many: research. --Sig_/2lWbsDISbUpQNbOE/BNjuep Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7ZXjIACgkQum4al0N1GQOygwCghGAeegg1ukdJuU5vkdp/6x8W 8owAn3qd/WCYjddJDfWKRH0RQXQ7/O1X =alPD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2lWbsDISbUpQNbOE/BNjuep--