From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-131917-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1RWXHw-0007nE-Ls
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:52:45 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A6EE21C0E0;
	Fri,  2 Dec 2011 17:52:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D831E21C045
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  2 Dec 2011 17:49:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by faai28 with SMTP id i28so2065993faa.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:49:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        bh=QGfCFFvzwcX/UbgP/S96N21/HC4bNEc5LRFU2klQHUE=;
        b=w+guvzBOHJUmHzNK62gQo8ITV3kSxJVXbcQIfsceWC8COZz6TJO3Vsjoi5k6VyfNYl
         1jQxbRuBKnfBKImiB0fxyxW1pH7RJc8/ZO4tPfTI6Htx7EuVVQZaCl6LmrGZSULf8tVt
         bDwGBqbGypRdNSroHybK2Ekx+hC27yyM3U+oc=
Received: by 10.180.104.35 with SMTP id gb3mr11358556wib.11.1322848186914;
        Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:49:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dt8sm3608104wib.21.2011.12.02.09.49.45
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:49:46 -0800 (PST)
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 17:50:36 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.0.6-gentoo; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <CAG-YhMsWczs96ZQ5Cast-PXLuZTDTzD199QkEm12bZVKgC6hVA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG-YhMsWczs96ZQ5Cast-PXLuZTDTzD199QkEm12bZVKgC6hVA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1683972.9gzmyBWzfY";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201112021750.46337.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: ffd465e3-35cc-46a0-9061-e6060f399d32
X-Archives-Hash: f0bcb6b805e36e1681f5b34cd8158bbb

--nextPart1683972.9gzmyBWzfY
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Friday 02 Dec 2011 14:41:29 LinuxIsOne wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> Does one have the experience for the following:
>=20
> gentoo vs openSUSE
>=20
> for ease of use, better navigation, applications working perfectly
> without any crash(es), better up gradations, smooth working,
> etc..etc...
>=20
> Best Regards.

If you want *exactly* what OpenSUSE have included in their distro then=20
OpenSUSE is for you.  Some applications and the whole system will run slowe=
r=20
than Gentoo.  Invariably some applications could experience crashes and wha=
t=20
not - any distro would from time to time have such problems and may not be=
=20
distro specific anyway, but application specific.

If you want to include additional applications or versions of applications=
=20
that OpenSUSE repos do not cater for, then you may run into dependency hell=
=2E =20
At best, some apps will just not install or work as intended.  At worst you=
=20
could break the underlying distro if you try hard enough and have to=20
reinstall.

With Gentoo you have higher flexibility on what you install and portage is=
=20
definitely thousands times better than YaST, in terms of configurabilty.  Y=
ou=20
will still get the odd application that is buggy, but as a rule your system=
=20
will run lighter and faster because each binary is compiled from source wit=
h=20
the CFALGS and USE flags that you have specified for your system.  On the o=
ther=20
hand it will take some time and effort to keep your Gentoo up to date.

Another difference between OpenSUSE and Gentoo is that you will not need to=
=20
reinstall Gentoo to get the latest desktop, or init system or what-ever sys=
tem=20
wide upgrade is next.  With OpenSUSE upgrades imply a reinstallation (unles=
s=20
YaST got cleverer since the last time I used it).  Invariably you will also=
=20
never need to reinstall Gentoo to fix any breakages - most problems you may=
=20
come across you will learn how to recover from with clever use of portage.

In conclusion:

If you prefer quick installation and easy/quick updates, but with limited=20
choice on what gets installed and how it is configured, and the OpenSUSE su=
ite=20
of packages will meet your application needs comprehensively, then OpenSUSE=
 is=20
a well polished distro that will fit the bill.

If you value higher performance and a much higher degree of configurability=
,=20
then Gentoo will be your choice;  but that comes at the expense of a=20
protracted installation process (especially if you have not done this befor=
e)=20
and some admin time on a regular basis to keep your system and applications=
 up=20
to date.

With Gentoo you will be *forced* to learn a lot to install your system and=
=20
keep it running.  With OpenSUSE the learning curve will likely be considera=
bly=20
flatter.

It would be advisable to try them both out in LiveCDs (or even install them=
 in=20
VMs) to see which you feel more comfortable working with.  For a Gentoo bas=
ed=20
LiveCD you could try Sabayon:  http://www.sabayon.org/ and this may also be=
=20
used for a quick (binary) installation of a Gentoo-like system.

HTH.
=2D-=20
Regards,
Mick

--nextPart1683972.9gzmyBWzfY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk7ZD/YACgkQVTDTR3kpaLbADACg0GZY42oywH8mXAA1k4fme4tJ
5XIAnjzTB4aL3Th88fZIJSdwLgxGODPm
=eNc6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1683972.9gzmyBWzfY--