From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RVvOm-0003US-Ud for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 01:25:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84F9621C036; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 01:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from karnak.local (cpc2-lutn10-2-0-cust603.9-3.cable.virginmedia.com [81.97.90.92]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F36121C023 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 01:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by karnak.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B613004 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 01:23:22 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at local Received: from karnak.local ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (karnak.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id koT-AczBCf-K for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 01:23:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from memphis.local (memphis.local [192.168.0.2]) by karnak.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24243002 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 01:23:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from memphis.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by memphis.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD481985C for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 01:23:20 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 01:23:12 +0000 From: David W Noon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Full disk encryption Message-ID: <20111201012312.385dcf5c@memphis.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20111130152753.176a9a08@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <4ED67664.1060302@gmail.com> <20111130202828.34f30c74@karnak.local> <20111130214733.19888eb1@digimed.co.uk> <20111130220735.5105ba14@karnak.local> <20111130232656.45b21f47@digimed.co.uk> <20111201002706.5a77f2fd@karnak.local> Organization: Luton Operatic Society X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/rLPU1fX9hdrcGDwBE.8ugI."; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 2cd4d737-fbb7-4618-b9f9-6cafd76d6331 X-Archives-Hash: fe3481361279c36d32c0709e672cc88a --Sig_/rLPU1fX9hdrcGDwBE.8ugI. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:39:11 -0500, Michael Mol wrote about "Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Full disk encryption": [snip] >Stupid question...Would using LZMA and a tarball reduce the size of >your initeamfs? Not really. I am already using gzip -9, and binaries don't compress especially well. Moreover, the archiver *must* be cpio, not tar. --=20 Regards, Dave [RLU #314465] =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D dwnoon@ntlworld.com (David W Noon) =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --Sig_/rLPU1fX9hdrcGDwBE.8ugI. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7W1wgACgkQRQ2Fs59Psv9UcwCg8+xAL//zCSVGcWIz2/nnopVe Mk4AnRsuuK4/SNIVYhPGtW115MsmSA2n =U69V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/rLPU1fX9hdrcGDwBE.8ugI.--