public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Google Talk and 9999 versions
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:13:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201111292314.00904.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ED4EB89.5020307@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1870 bytes --]

On Tuesday 29 Nov 2011 14:26:17 Dale wrote:
> Michael Mol wrote:
> > on my partial ~amd64 system, I have googletalk-plugin installed, and
> > it serves me well. On my new box (also partial ~amd64, but far more in
> > the stable realm than unstable realm), I tried to emerge
> > googletalk-plugin, and it's masked. It's also a '9999' version
> > package. I vaguely recall that '9999' packages are special somehow.
> > How is that?
> 
> I think those are called the live builds.  Basically, they are not
> tested much and are really close to falling off the bleeding edge.  I
> rarely mess with those.  There is a google-talkplugin-2.5.6.0 that is
> not live but keyworded.  If it was me, I would at least try that version
> first.  It is likely tested a bit more, not going to change so often and
> be stable as it gets in the unstable branch of the tree.  If that fails,
> go back to the older version.  If neither works, then I would try to
> 9999 build.  I'd also cross my fingers for good measure.

9999 builds is the latest potentially unstable and incomplete code that the 
devs just churned out and uploaded to cvs.  10 minutes later may be another 
revision  and so on.  Every time you rebuild you'll be downloading the latest 
attempt of their coding.

What is annoying is that you had it working just right and suddenly all the 
9999 builds have come off the boil and break in a bad way.  This can be 
particularly burdensome or even debilitating for a prolonged period, like I 
experienced with some wireless drivers in the past.

Of course, not all 9999 packages are that 'unstable'.  I've been running e17 
for some time now and only every once in a while I happen to come across a bug 
or build problem.  Even so, I tend not to update 9999 packages often, once I 
get a well behaving revision.

YMMV

-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2011-11-29 23:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-29 13:57 [gentoo-user] Google Talk and 9999 versions Michael Mol
2011-11-29 14:26 ` Dale
2011-11-29 23:13   ` Mick [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201111292314.00904.michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
    --to=michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox