From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RRczB-0000OL-Ns for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:57:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F268B21C052; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EA321C037 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:56:03 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAMI2x05FpaGK/2dsb2JhbABEqj2BBoFyAQEFOhwzCxgcEhQlN75Cg1mDKYIyYwSIGowhhUyIC4RL X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,537,1315195200"; d="scan'208";a="148567183" Received: from 69-165-161-138.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO waltdnes.org) ([69.165.161.138]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with SMTP; 18 Nov 2011 23:55:46 -0500 Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 23:55:39 -0500 From: waltdnes@waltdnes.org Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 23:55:39 -0500 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Progress on s/udev/mdev/ Message-ID: <20111119045539.GA8261@waltdnes.org> References: <2555285.aKV8YnI3Jg@tux> <20111118235345.089f8867@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: d9b23905-beeb-476a-9082-6dffcd19f3c2 X-Archives-Hash: 8d07f06ddd91e951f408434d6c2e0b6c On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 08:41:43AM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote > On Nov 19, 2011 6:56 AM, "Neil Bothwick" wrote: > > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 09:38:42 +1100, Paul Colquhoun wrote: > > > > > You can copy the ebuild to your own private overlay > > > ( /usr/local/portage ) make your changes there, and bump the version > > > number slightly. > > > > No need to bump the version number, overlays take priority over the > > standard tree when there are equal version numbers. > > > > I knew I forgot something so simple >.< > > Thanks! > > Hmmm... so, @waltdnes, you should modify the procedure a bit, there... Will do. This is what beta tests are for . -- Walter Dnes