From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RQ4bL-0004Qu-H3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:02:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30EDF21C06A; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fsm2.ukr.net (fsm2.ukr.net [195.214.192.121]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C6D21C032 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:01:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=Om6dn5y7WwsNvRGh1zSL5K393fSMgx7EseFBgkERsfo=; b=Tltpi99lNWNr5hEPm41eK44rWyO6uB/jHJpoD8cu0XgzlMMqIuYRPH2A9Njb/8EMQcdz9ybQfRmbBh5x/QtrRxtwRiEcrIdj+43XHcRiuK5ye32W+9w29Pamvsb1DwQ+00H96d/cXmxFjHrpLLSQJDfhwv038+GrLEA+Lglchyo=; Received: from [79.135.196.121] (helo=Ganymede) by fsm2.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1RQ4aI-0005TI-Uz ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:00:59 +0200 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:01:48 +0200 From: v_2e@ukr.net To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)? Message-Id: <20111115000148.f82d095f.v_2e@ukr.net> In-Reply-To: References: <4EBE38F3.2000005@binarywings.net> <201111121155.41045.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20111112131152.GA18475@ksp.sk> <4EC0E905.9050200@fedoraproject.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.2 (GTK+ 2.24.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 7f4f74df-4275-43e0-825b-331831f28595 X-Archives-Hash: 50106fd2dc57abe5aa4f6e8e2a855449 There is a very small web server called "thttpd" which is very lightweight and lets start serving files very quickly. It runs on my home router machine with an old Pentium CPU and several megabytes of RAM and seems to consume about 500 kb of it. Regards, Vladimir On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:36:22 -0500 Michael Mol wrote: > Isn't there a kernelland HTTP server? ISTR seeing the option. I don't > know anything about it, though. >=20 > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:10 AM, microcai > wrote: > > > > http://code.google.com/p/bashttpd/ > > > > run with systemd or xinetd > > > > > > > > =E4=BA=8E 2011=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8814=E6=97=A5 18:05, J. Roeleveld =E5= =86=99=E9=81=93: > >> On Sat, November 12, 2011 2:11 pm, YoYo Siska wrote: > >>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 07:40:08PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: > >>>> During my drive home, something hit my brain: why not have the > >>>> 'master' server share the distfiles dir via NFS? > >>>> > >>>> So, the question now becomes: what's the drawback/benefit of > >>>> NFS-sharing vs > >>>> HTTP-sharing? The scenario is back-end LAN at the office, thus, a > >>>> trusted > >>>> network by definition. > >>> > >>> NFS doesn't like when it looses connection to the server. The only > >>> problems I had ever with NFS were because I forgot to unmout it > >>> before a server restart or when I =C2=A0took a computer (laptop) of= f > >>> to another network... > >> > >> NFS-shares can work, but these need to be umounted before network > >> goes. If server goes, problems can occur there as well. > >> But that is true with any server/client filesharing. (CIFS/Samba, > >> for instance) > >> > >>> Otherwise it works well, esp. when mounted ro on the clients, > >>> however for distfiles it might make sense to allow the clients > >>> download and save tarballs that are not there yet ;), though I > >>> never used it with many computer emerging/downloading same same > >>> stuff, so can't say if locking etc works correctly... > >> > >> Locking works correctly, have had 5 machines share the same > >> NFS-shared distfiles and all downloading the source-files. > >> > >>> And with NFS the clients won't duplicate the files in their own > >>> distfiles directories ;) > >> > >> Big plus, for me :) > >> > >> -- > >> Joost > >> > >> > > > > > > >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > :wq >=20 >=20 -----=20