From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RFYr8-0003fX-Gr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:06:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B9CA21C178; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F1421C149 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyh5 with SMTP id 5so567345wyh.40 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:04:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=VLtChbPiQdwOS6Yiy5heggwSwU8VeMbEaDDcrsu1+3Y=; b=SGAH5E+JsEpwqZgOKJGvo0OIn+8f6CgRifX2tK3dQeHsg7DzSD3IsWf1BPU/892Vg1 6AZmqVi3JQBWQDGrp0rglCYugZVBuSesFc858TrlQHzn6ieC6en9f+5ndTlz1mfQvVGx oue1QQdzKYEA0YjD2cvilvuoopSHlTm3ADZJE= Received: by 10.227.2.69 with SMTP id 5mr6217667wbi.16.1318802654822; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id es10sm27589732wbb.4.2011.10.16.15.04.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:04:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Another Install Issue Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:03:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo-r3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <4E9A119D.1000501@gmail.com> <201110161702.19395.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20111016222417.10a9af21@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20111016222417.10a9af21@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1714063.EjWGVjdENB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110162304.20064.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 6a051d6bc3584db5fb69d6ab774e7bf5 --nextPart1714063.EjWGVjdENB Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 16 Oct 2011 22:24:17 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:02:08 +0100, Mick wrote: > > As I said above the kernel ought to manage the order in which the > > modules and dependencies are loaded. >=20 > Would building one modules into the kernel and the other as a module > solve (well, kludge) the loading order problem? I don't know really - but it would be something that I would try if I had t= his=20 problem. The only other thing is a local init script to do the deed. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1714063.EjWGVjdENB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk6bVOMACgkQVTDTR3kpaLYu6gCgiydi+CG4qmqN16cTsTaWFBxj 5ssAoIr1t0DqfFuHdoSE8FdOVP+0Arxw =aU2Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1714063.EjWGVjdENB--