From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RF4c9-00083K-8t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:49:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C92A521C0F6; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F6621C10D for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwg14 with SMTP id 14so4184014wwg.10 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 06:48:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zcobo0Os5W9ZasM+RWe3wXrnjRTDzbo6mEDVUeyZ1Rw=; b=gL/dFtlHDG1XibV4Uii3cs9iU3LI06nGn7XA11sXLaA5V3MOPKtanf9O+EwQurhmim EcPN8Y8eld/FIfoofuvQPSguecoOeM2PfGaC8RxYEG41OEWgRTzbMxkTUGOARfj00OLm j8cxhs+EU9/ZgfCHHlroOsvitjop5gpY/RYoI= Received: by 10.216.230.92 with SMTP id i70mr4200578weq.80.1318686488722; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 06:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rohan.example.com ([196.215.144.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k26sm19974916wbo.16.2011.10.15.06.48.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 15 Oct 2011 06:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 15:48:00 +0200 From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Apologize to everyone for my nonprofessional Message-ID: <20111015154800.7e3b25c0@rohan.example.com> In-Reply-To: References: <4E98601C.3030607@gmail.com> <20111014224110.7acaf5b3@digimed.co.uk> <4E98BBE4.6040306@gmail.com> <4E992E82.5010103@gmail.com> Organization: Internet Solutions X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 004d5b45653998c7c0f9feaf217a3434 On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:34:10 -0700 Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s wrote: > It basically removes the need for a "pesky init* thingy", although for > the life of me I cannot understand why someone will not see the > technical advantages of actually using an initramfs. I'll use your own opening comment as a reply: using !=3D requiring The benefits of an initramfs are insufficient to *require* an initramfs. Now, we've been over this and thrashed it to death already. You had your say and the majority consensus around here is that we do not like it. DROP THIS SUBJECT. RIGHT NOW. PLEASE. --=20 Alan McKinnnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com