From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Apologize to everyone for my nonprofessional
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 15:48:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111015154800.7e3b25c0@rohan.example.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPrc83X8ewGevW6-1zzowC01=jHfq_zZ3LSp0LAphyp4gzQNg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:34:10 -0700
Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@gmail.com> wrote:
> It basically removes the need for a "pesky init* thingy", although for
> the life of me I cannot understand why someone will not see the
> technical advantages of actually using an initramfs.
I'll use your own opening comment as a reply:
using != requiring
The benefits of an initramfs are insufficient to *require* an initramfs.
Now, we've been over this and thrashed it to death already. You had
your say and the majority consensus around here is that we do not like
it.
DROP THIS SUBJECT. RIGHT NOW. PLEASE.
--
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-15 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-14 15:43 [gentoo-user] Apologize to everyone for my nonprofessional Lavender
2011-10-14 15:52 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-14 16:15 ` Dale
2011-10-14 21:41 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-10-14 22:47 ` Dale
2011-10-15 5:10 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-10-15 6:56 ` Dale
2011-10-15 7:09 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-10-15 7:34 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 7:50 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 8:35 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 8:42 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 8:53 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 9:11 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 9:31 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 9:47 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 10:05 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 10:34 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 10:45 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 11:04 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 19:23 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 10:49 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 18:57 ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-10-15 23:25 ` Mike Edenfield
2011-10-15 8:37 ` Dale
2011-10-15 9:02 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 9:15 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 9:21 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 9:32 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 9:49 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 9:37 ` Dale
2011-10-15 9:54 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 17:23 ` Dale
2011-10-15 14:23 ` pk
2011-10-15 16:46 ` Claudio Roberto França Pereira
2011-10-15 19:20 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 21:15 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-10-15 9:53 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-10-15 10:10 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 11:31 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-10-15 12:19 ` Jonas de Buhr
2011-10-15 13:44 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-10-15 13:48 ` Alan McKinnon [this message]
2011-10-15 18:43 ` Joost Roeleveld
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-14 16:05 [gentoo-user] 回复： " Lavender
2011-10-17 12:45 ` du yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111015154800.7e3b25c0@rohan.example.com \
--to=alan.mckinnon@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox