From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RDbtT-0006mC-8X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:57:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AD1621C4A7; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAB921C12E for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwg14 with SMTP id 14so8946284wwg.10 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:54:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=Nh2Q2cFanj9GqgKLI9tb0XxUioKyOiYf/wMjWXeKMjU=; b=sZVW9mOmZSM5Knrz40RyhikK9frrqsgODuuM94z0kvhKZ/w9BCVroEC/WPmRqaNDQD sYfoHPkExJncdkyw/03RCrUwe6U21O7iI8Akyu4bRDsSQv2piNuGwYI7VPSc0bDR9/2+ iPWglF/AIxCv265nZ63B9Ia8ns2NA5bxzOMjU= Received: by 10.216.4.158 with SMTP id 30mr822028wej.54.1318337665887; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:54:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (212-70-208-152.ath.static.tee.gr. [212.70.208.152]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h14sm38399369wbo.7.2011.10.11.05.54.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:54:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: this is spam (was: Re: [gentoo-user] =?utf-8?q?=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A_=5Bgentoo-user=5D_Anyone_can_afford?= =?utf-8?q?_information_about_build?= kernel?) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:54:06 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo-r3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20111011130327.3bcf7ecd@toxic.dbnet> <20111011135112.1b670ab6@toxic.dbnet> In-Reply-To: <20111011135112.1b670ab6@toxic.dbnet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4362079.tBdKzFl9tx"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110111354.25894.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 7ad9914dc048a02375a0d958e2c70aac --nextPart4362079.tBdKzFl9tx Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 11 Oct 2011 12:51:12 Jonas de Buhr wrote: > Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:03:27 +0200 >=20 > schrieb Jonas de Buhr : > > it's nice how much many people on this this list are willing to help > > in spite of all this. but am i really the only one who finds the > > behavior described above at least confusing? > > anyway, i'm quite convinced it is fake. >=20 > no, apparently i am not the only one thinking that: > http://www.stopforumspam.com/ipcheck/58.243.95.123 Interesting! Well, the broken English is not an insurmountable problem as long as we=20 understand the question asked. Not everyone is blessed with good knowledge= of=20 the English language. The questions seem genuine, so it may help the OP or others that have simil= ar=20 problems. The lack of netiqutte, well ... if I only I had a penny for every time that= we=20 have collectively or singularly asked people to respect it. ;-) Now, if as you say it is indeed spam, what escapes me is why would someone= =20 spam the list in this manner? It doesn't make sense. So I am led to belie= ve=20 that the peculiarities you mention are probably a cultural (or personal)=20 issue. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart4362079.tBdKzFl9tx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk6UPIEACgkQVTDTR3kpaLbQqQCfcmyGvo/PXksFw+62wJkKuQB2 cC0AoKmqI5jKA37g3+8esHgto4/t5y70 =lT75 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4362079.tBdKzFl9tx--