From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RDOW8-00059y-GM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:40:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 608AF21C368; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.3]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAE821C33B for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D513BDEC00 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:34:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sPd-A8PpgxUi for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:47:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from wstn.localnet (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD6BDEB5D for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:34:25 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Computers and mental/emotional health Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:34:24 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo-r3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <4E909DB4.8030504@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-KMail-Markup: true Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary-01=_wL3kOfHmnbl4FGQ" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110102334.24742.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 4a1658999f07ee7ecef132c745aeee77 --Boundary-01=_wL3kOfHmnbl4FGQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Saturday 08 October 2011 20:12:44 Mark Knecht wrote: > I lost 45 pounds (approximately 25% of my pre-diet weight) this year > on Atkins. I know a lot of folks have trouble with Atkins but it > worked great for me. As I understand it, it's based on sound biochemistry - not like the popular low-fat fad. That's why it works. Have you ever wondered why the blooming of obesity has coincided with the popularity of the low-fat diet? -- Rgds Peter Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23 --Boundary-01=_wL3kOfHmnbl4FGQ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Saturday 08 October 2011 20:12:44 Mark Knecht wrote:


> I lost 45 pounds (approximately 25% of my pre-diet weight) this year

> on Atkins. I know a lot of folks have trouble with Atkins but it

> worked great for me.


As I understand it, it's based on sound biochemistry - not like the popular low-fat fad. That's why it works.


Have you ever wondered why the blooming of obesity has coincided with the popularity of the low-fat diet?


--

Rgds

Peter Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23



--Boundary-01=_wL3kOfHmnbl4FGQ--