From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-129456-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1RC52w-0006sn-9j
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 07:40:42 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5986C21C1DB;
	Fri,  7 Oct 2011 07:40:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ey0-f181.google.com (mail-ey0-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F7F21C130
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  7 Oct 2011 07:38:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by eye3 with SMTP id 3so1147487eye.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization
         :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=EuTk7imCCzdrCCVB3KZW+afZNnjfP5bKgVat2PpwCoI=;
        b=jta2H3BC9gogfJklmiA+785+txwwg2otQ0Xei1rNy5r5KE61O0hkohUP5FONRSq0GY
         Nfkwq6unUPOa4Q9P4PIuYVqG0lYLIqLe+QnYGV/9y9VC3lmj/GI551aHFNe5qWcmhY3O
         J2HWsq1o3jB4d1gmKA8CUqsNTexVglZ/ebzZw=
Received: by 10.14.35.85 with SMTP id t61mr157931eea.132.1317973120979;
        Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rohan.example.com ([196.215.144.38])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u11sm12895725eeb.2.2011.10.07.00.38.37
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 09:38:33 +0200
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is grub2 stable and who uses it?
Message-ID: <20111007093833.5e814d8d@rohan.example.com>
In-Reply-To: <201110070108.24517.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org>
References: <4E8AD6C4.7070901@gmail.com>
	<CA+czFiBe7v+V7UQca04ZFOFpBqKCNBB+n7V4NYdm3=hDd=YQjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E8DDA01.6040001@darkmetatron.de>
	<201110070108.24517.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org>
Organization: Internet Solutions
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: f1cce145f53a7e0bac29b650da490f14

On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 01:08:24 +0100
Peter Humphrey <peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> wrote:

> On Thursday 06 October 2011 17:40:33 Sebastian Be=C3=9Fler wrote:
> > Am 06.10.2011 17:25, schrieb Michael Mol:
> > >> Let's hold a poll. How many list readers get it?
> > >=20
> > > It's not c which is in doubt, but its function as an upper
> > > limit. ;)
> >=20
> > And even if the results a true and not an error then there is a
> > list of possible explanations. Most of them leave c as upper limit
> > in place. Quantum Mechanics has many aces in his sleeve like micro
> > wormholes or traveling through higher dimensions. All these
> > dimensions from string theorie must be good for something ;-)
>=20
> Just think of the consequences if c is not the ultimate speed limit.
> I am, and they're so numerous that I can't even contemplate them all.

Permit me to direct you to the pearl of wisdom about that in the movie
K-Pax



--=20
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com