From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R5xnC-0003Vh-51 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:43:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA31921C2A0; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D48D21C29C for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zaphod.digimed.co.uk (zaphod.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.1]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDE1D8074D for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:41:36 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:41:36 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Updating libpng: another libtool cockup? Message-ID: <20110920114136.1c3ae00f@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <732.1316471384@ccs.covici.com> References: <20110919161002.52493882@rohan.example.com> <20110919164955.0f8e86ba@karnak.local> <201109192154.32120.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <732.1316471384@ccs.covici.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10cvs16 (GTK+ 2.24.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/EkRlfWJ01T3Qq+g7zlvkDuX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 7d8bd376cc234fb25673c89413bb8401 --Sig_/EkRlfWJ01T3Qq+g7zlvkDuX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:29:44 -0400, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > Well, you have me convinced. I had assumed that a bland > > revdep-rebuild would catch everything including the library > > specified. Wrong, I see. =20 > Would preserved-rebuild catch everything that the revdep-rebuild fails > to catch? In theory yes, in practice it missed a couple of deep dependencies here. --=20 Neil Bothwick The law of Probability Dispersal decrees that whatever it is that hits the fan will not be evenly distributed. --Sig_/EkRlfWJ01T3Qq+g7zlvkDuX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk54beAACgkQum4al0N1GQPTzwCgi9KKAYaDY4GXbKWCAgubKOBn PVsAnjJU4PK8X0CqQgJ/HKxLC4ABLlLU =05Kj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/EkRlfWJ01T3Qq+g7zlvkDuX--