From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Updating libpng: another libtool cockup?
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:10:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110919161002.52493882@rohan.example.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316426790.32031.8.camel@k9>
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 03:06:30 -0700
walt <w41ter@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 01:39 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:58:14 -0400
> > Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@nyu.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Sep 18 2011, walt wrote:
> > >
> > > > I just did a routine update on my ~amd64 machine and saw the
> > > > portage warning that libpng14 has been replaced by libpng15,
> > > > and I should run revdep-rebuild --library
> > > > '/usr/lib/libpng14.so' and then delete the obsolete library.
> > > >
> > > > After that I ran plain revdep-rebuild as I do after every
> > > > update, and saw that two gnome packages failed to rebuild
> > > > properly because lpng14 couldn't be found :/
> > > >
> > > > From painful experience I've learned that good-old libtool files
> > > > (*.la) are the usual suspects, and grep found -lpng14 in about
> > > > ten .la files even after both revdep-rebuilds. Grrr!
> > > >
> > > > This fixed the problem for me (as similar moves have done in the
> > > > past):
> > > >
> > > > #find /usr/lib64 -name \*.la -exec sed -i s/png14/png15/ '{}'
> > > > ';'
> > >
> > > Thanks for the tip. I wonder when a routing update world tells
> > > you to run
> > > revdep-rebuild --library <some-lib>
> > > should you run it before or after the normal
> > > revdep-rebuild
> > > that we normally run after updates?
> >
> > Neither.
> >
> > revdep-rebuild checks everything, revdep-rebuild --library
> > checks just some things.
> >
> > ebuilds sometimes issue messages to check just the libraries known
> > to have been updated, but a full revdep-rebuild after an update
> > will catch those anyway.
>
> Until recently I skipped the "--library" step exactly because I knew
> revdep-rebuild will find and fix the broken packages after I delete
> the old library. So, why bother with the --library step, right?
>
> However. A few weeks ago I got caught when I deleted one of those
> obsolete libraries and only then did I find out that gcc is one of
> the packages that depend on it :(
>
> I don't skip the --library step any more.
That's odd behaviour, I wonder what caused the difference.
Surely revdep-rebuild itself can't do this different just because you
specified a library to compare? I wonder if that lib was maybe in the
revdep-rebuild exclude list.
I'd be interested to track it down for reference, do you remember the
library involved?
--
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-19 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-18 20:10 [gentoo-user] Updating libpng: another libtool cockup? walt
2011-09-18 20:48 ` Michael Mol
2011-09-18 20:57 ` Thanasis
2011-09-18 21:54 ` Mick
2011-09-18 21:58 ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-09-18 23:39 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-09-19 10:06 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2011-09-19 14:10 ` Alan McKinnon [this message]
2011-09-19 14:20 ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-09-19 14:34 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-19 14:58 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Updating libpng: another lib tool cockup? Allan Gottlieb
2011-09-19 15:19 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-19 15:28 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-09-19 15:49 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-19 15:49 ` Paul Hartman
2011-09-19 17:57 ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-09-19 18:19 ` Paul Hartman
2011-09-19 20:08 ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-09-20 10:38 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-09-20 12:57 ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-09-19 16:30 ` covici
2011-09-19 14:36 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Updating libpng: another libtool cockup? Michael Mol
2011-09-19 20:33 ` Mark Knecht
2011-09-19 20:41 ` Michael Mol
2011-09-19 20:52 ` Mark Knecht
2011-09-19 21:10 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-19 21:28 ` Mark Knecht
2011-09-19 15:07 ` walt
2011-09-19 15:49 ` David W Noon
2011-09-19 20:54 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-09-19 22:29 ` covici
2011-09-20 10:41 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-09-19 14:06 ` [gentoo-user] " Allan Gottlieb
2011-09-19 21:04 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110919161002.52493882@rohan.example.com \
--to=alan.mckinnon@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox