From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R3iAH-00057d-Cl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 05:37:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C35A21C1AF; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 05:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93BE421C063 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 05:00:56 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At0FAI00cE5MCo4X/2dsb2JhbABBmS2OSnmBUwEBBAE6HCgLCzQSFCU3h3e2CIYOYASYZIdThEQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,378,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="136243119" Received: from 76-10-142-23.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO waltdnes.org) ([76.10.142.23]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with SMTP; 14 Sep 2011 01:00:54 -0400 Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:01:11 -0400 From: "Walter Dnes" Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:01:11 -0400 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot Message-ID: <20110914050111.GA19760@waltdnes.org> References: <201108191109.34984.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <2799076.QhjHdal4hI@pc> <2110889.rUh24Q481G@pc> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 85d2abda37998dc6f4dbe6f03c5b97cd On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:03:53PM -0400, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s wrote > I answered that already (actually, in that paragraph). But again: udev > is not trivial, and it solves a (far from) trivial problem. If some > developers think they can outsmart the kernel devs, please, lets try > it. Maybe they will. A fraction of 1% of linux users need to run initramfs or keep /usr on /. Why should the remaining 99%+ be required to follow suit? -- Walter Dnes