From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R2PNb-0001c2-6C for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:22:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28ACC21C1F1; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.virtyou.com (mx.virtyou.com [94.23.166.77]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D3721C1F7 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from weird.wonkology.org (p5B277D65.dip.t-dialin.net [91.39.125.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.virtyou.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC54439A00B for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:19:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:19:36 +0200 From: Alex Schuster To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] License question for jdk Message-ID: <20110910171936.66d5715e@weird.wonkology.org> In-Reply-To: <3996294.tE4vUV8cOn@pc> References: <20110910165030.28956c7e@weird.wonkology.org> <3996294.tE4vUV8cOn@pc> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 8bae0525f22d4def845aa4ff351c0ef1 Michael Schreckenbauer writes: > On Saturday, 10. September 2011 16:50:30 Alex Schuster wrote: > > What you need to do is to tell portage you accept the license by > > putting the >=dev-java/... line into /etc/portage/package.license. Or > > you could add the --autounmask-write switch to your emerge command, > > and then use etc-update/dispatch-conf/cfg-update or whatever you use > > to update the config files. > > Ah. This /etc/portage/package.license thing is new to me. > I use ACCEPT_LICENSE in make.conf. > You know, what's the difference (if any)? No, I don't there is any. Just like with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS. It's just cleaner to have this in package.license I think. The man pages for portage and make.conf have some more information on this. Wonko