From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-127885-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1R1mEs-0002xY-JN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:34:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D48E21C298; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 21:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.muc.de (colin.muc.de [193.149.48.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387AD21C1FA for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 21:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48637 invoked by uid 3782); 8 Sep 2011 21:33:22 -0000 Received: from acm.muc.de (pD9556D77.dip.t-dialin.net [217.85.109.119]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 23:33:21 +0200 Received: (qmail 3841 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Sep 2011 21:29:40 -0000 Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 21:29:40 +0000 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot Message-ID: <20110908212940.GB2338@acm.acm> References: <201108191109.34984.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20110908220536.55dd3798@rohan> <CADPrc80VoojW=mpy1qudHpHT=uHY_=tgm9hwv9psEVrrGpg_uw@mail.gmail.com> <1868314.dUVoYqWeDk@pc> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1868314.dUVoYqWeDk@pc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 67fabcc9ecdc66fcecaa5159cd0f8d69 Hi, all. Forgive me butting in at a random place in this rather heated thread, but .... On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:43:29PM +0200, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 16:23:36 schrieb Canek Pel=E1ez Vald=E9= s: > > > In what valid way does access to /usr become something that udev ma= y be > > > required to support? > > It is a matter of what else do you end having in /bin and /lib. > > Remember that udev rules can execute arbitrary code. Do all that code > > needs to be moved to /bin and /lib also? > Of course. That's what /bin, /sbin and /lib are for. > > I keep telling: it is a difficult problem. > No. Just move or copy the binaries and libs *you* use for *your* udev-s= cripts=20 > to /bin, /sbin and /lib Would it not be possible to have a minimal /usr tree in the root partition for udev's use at boot time, and to later mount a more robust /= usr partition over this? What am I missing here? > > Regards. > Regards, > Michael --=20 Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).