From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-127710-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1R0yre-0007Oc-Pf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:51:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB71F21C268; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.muc.de (colin.muc.de [193.149.48.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28A521C255 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16358 invoked by uid 3782); 6 Sep 2011 16:47:18 -0000 Received: from acm.muc.de (pD951A7AA.dip.t-dialin.net [217.81.167.170]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:47:17 +0200 Received: (qmail 16815 invoked by uid 1000); 6 Sep 2011 16:43:39 -0000 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:43:39 +0000 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? Message-ID: <20110906164339.GB9867@acm.acm> References: <87ehzuiu1y.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> <4E65405E.8020809@wonkology.org> <j43vuj$6mk$1@dough.gmane.org> <CADPrc81MEemnh4Y5fiP7NODm-yqRVfBeHh1AKf07FUWBTSdjwQ@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <CADPrc81MEemnh4Y5fiP7NODm-yqRVfBeHh1AKf07FUWBTSdjwQ@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: eba17d59dadf3de889a6cd53893d7b57 On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 11:57:06AM -0400, Canek Pel=E1ez Vald=E9s wrote: > In my puny laptop, CUPS takes 1 min to compile, the source code is 4.4 > Mb and the installed binaries are 9.3 Mb. It seems to be updated at > the rate of once a month, roughly. > I have never configured CUPS, *ever*, and it always just works when I > connect to a new network. The printers just appear in the print > dialog, and it always works. It always remembers my last selected > options. > To me it seems a rather sane default to always require the most used > printing system in an office suite. Is that right? How about it being saner to conform to standardised interfaces, protocols and formats? At one time, Sendmail was the most used mail server. Does anybody still use it? For that matter why shouldn't we all be required to use the most used operating system? Seems we have a case of "embrace and extend" working here. No, the sane alternative is to use the `lpr' command, possibly augmented by special arguments for particular spoolers, but always having a fallback to standard `lpr'. That way, everybody's happy. Even me. ;-) Do you know a decent office suite which runs under G/L? Looks like I'll be needing one soon. > Regards. > --=20 > Canek Pel=E1ez Vald=E9s > Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingenier=EDa de la Computaci=F3n > Universidad Nacional Aut=F3noma de M=E9xico --=20 Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).