From: Alex Schuster <wonko@wonkology.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What is up with the libreoffice ebuild?
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:07:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110906010731.3e491d26@weird.wonkology.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110905234707.42c1a2c9@digimed.co.uk>
Neil Bothwick writes:
> On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:34:22 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
>
> > Same here on ~amd64. The last change is that cups is mandatory now, so
> > the cups USE flag has been removed. I would have preferred if the
> > ebuild got a -r2 so I could simply mask it, as compiling it again
> > would not change a thing when the cups USE flag was enabled already.
>
> Policy is to not bump the revision if the code it installs is the same.
Hmm, that's right, too.
> It could be considered a bug in portage that this change results in a
> rebuild with --changed-use.
>
> You can stop it happening by removing cups from
> /var/db/pkg/app-office/libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r1/USE, which fools portage
> into thinking it was installed without the flag.
Neat! Thanks, I didn't think about that. Works fine, emerge -Dautv
--changed-use @world no longer picks up libreoffice.
Wonko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-05 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-05 21:00 [gentoo-user] What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? Graham Murray
2011-09-05 21:16 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-09-05 21:34 ` Alex Schuster
2011-09-05 22:47 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-09-05 23:07 ` Alex Schuster [this message]
2011-09-06 1:51 ` Alan Mackenzie
2011-09-06 2:03 ` Brennan Shacklett
2011-09-06 9:12 ` Alex Schuster
2011-09-06 10:07 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-09-06 11:07 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-09-06 11:20 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-09-07 7:56 ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-09-07 9:09 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-09-06 20:27 ` Alex Schuster
2011-09-06 22:24 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-09-06 11:25 ` Stroller
2011-09-06 13:20 ` Michael Mol
2011-09-06 15:50 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-09-06 16:01 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2011-09-06 16:17 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-09-06 16:20 ` Dale
2011-09-06 21:05 ` Grant Edwards
2011-09-06 21:54 ` Dale
2011-09-06 22:35 ` Hartmut Figge
2011-09-06 23:34 ` Dale
2011-09-06 16:59 ` David W Noon
2011-09-06 15:59 ` [gentoo-user] " Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-09-06 15:27 ` Alan Mackenzie
2011-09-06 2:19 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2011-09-06 14:16 ` Dale
2011-09-06 15:57 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-09-06 16:16 ` Dale
2011-09-06 16:28 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-09-06 16:28 ` Paul Hartman
2011-09-06 16:45 ` Michael Mol
2011-09-06 19:21 ` Paul Hartman
2011-09-06 16:49 ` Alan Mackenzie
2011-09-06 17:02 ` Michael Mol
2011-09-06 17:55 ` Alan Mackenzie
2011-09-06 18:22 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-09-06 18:57 ` Alan Mackenzie
2011-09-06 19:16 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-09-06 19:20 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-06 19:20 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-09-06 20:22 ` Alan Mackenzie
2011-09-06 19:21 ` Michael Mol
2011-09-06 19:29 ` James Broadhead
2011-09-06 20:46 ` Albert W. Hopkins
2011-09-06 18:23 ` Michael Mol
2011-09-06 18:43 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-06 16:54 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-06 16:43 ` Alan Mackenzie
2011-09-06 17:03 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-06 17:48 ` Alan Mackenzie
2011-09-06 18:18 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-09-06 21:12 ` Grant Edwards
2011-09-06 21:24 ` Michael Mol
2011-09-06 21:34 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-09-06 21:26 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-09-06 21:35 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-06 21:52 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-09-06 22:30 ` Paul Hartman
2011-09-06 22:37 ` Paul Hartman
2011-09-06 22:48 ` Big Firefox (Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild?) Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-06 22:39 ` [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? Hartmut Figge
2011-09-06 23:31 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-09-06 23:56 ` Dale
2011-09-07 0:09 ` Alex Schuster
2011-09-07 0:12 ` Hartmut Figge
2011-09-06 22:43 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-06 22:58 ` Brennan Shacklett
2011-09-06 22:59 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-06 22:53 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-09-11 12:55 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-09-11 13:06 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-09-11 13:32 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-09-11 20:17 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-09-11 21:27 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-09-06 18:40 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-06 19:19 ` pk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110906010731.3e491d26@weird.wonkology.org \
--to=wonko@wonkology.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox