From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-127447-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1QyJCi-0003I8-Da for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:57:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82D8721C1FE; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723B121C1E7 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zaphod.digimed.co.uk (zaphod.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.1]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34194804D4 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:56:35 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:56:30 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important package blocked by another important package Message-ID: <20110830085630.18aaed0d@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <CAA2qdGWhgmQpf3bOd4h82WUqGYpO11YVf7J1eXViopKU6sMLnA@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110830022716.GC6313@solfire> <CAA2qdGWDzbuWx5C_i1G8ZKH0q4c1_bsbJjJNYkgkxucs_6=7hg@mail.gmail.com> <20110830032927.GF6313@solfire> <CAA2qdGWhgmQpf3bOd4h82WUqGYpO11YVf7J1eXViopKU6sMLnA@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10cvs7 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/K/d5qLtpJvSQV=BT0lKCWK_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 12024cdcae85140b76abd869df7526e9 --Sig_/K/d5qLtpJvSQV=BT0lKCWK_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:15:07 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: > It is not that unknown -- in the Gentoo world -- for a stable package > to pull in an unstable package, because packages don't get stabilized > at the same time. It is not unknown, but it is wrong. Stable packages should never pull in testing packages and a bug report should be filed. --=20 Neil Bothwick Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about. --Sig_/K/d5qLtpJvSQV=BT0lKCWK_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk5cl7IACgkQum4al0N1GQO2BQCgzjG8iM0UPgXIpqlNvaeOEhqN 93IAn2fF//CgV/lgu/aERogzvhl0oALO =JHn3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/K/d5qLtpJvSQV=BT0lKCWK_--