From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qv7JG-0000Wa-5t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:39:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 010A321C229; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F05921C1FD for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:36:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so4048992wyg.40 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 05:36:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=gXyPskyrrK0B1NegoqMjmEAYY4kCGRilQjQzoD7D6xE=; b=FfRJu1+LFctyJ7nisScx8AS3vgdMeGiG41z6A1td8cgzMj3qvh2E2F15vCXk/F8sct 7R8vHRkJyjVqnqXQ8nWEJOrNsuMiIMcFLyNyEJfkQn0oOcVdOChtYc/5xO/tngpHwMlB 7Tbbg18rN9gZCVNDXa5gSeugDBLyN3ZDfD8Mw= Received: by 10.227.173.201 with SMTP id q9mr1132034wbz.92.1313930215738; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 05:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ew4sm4043395wbb.25.2011.08.21.05.36.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 21 Aug 2011 05:36:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Suspend to RAM caused crashes Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 13:37:22 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo-r3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201108211127.57077.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <201108211243.07642.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2109767.HUeP3s9o77"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201108211337.40903.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: aae75f5615d2a405a990fb47f841c7cb --nextPart2109767.HUeP3s9o77 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 21 Aug 2011 12:57:48 Pandu Poluan wrote: > (sorry for top-posting) >=20 > Do the 1 GB pieces have the same timing values as the 0.5 GB pieces? Yes, same timing values. When I bought the 1G modules I made sure that the= y=20 were matched exactly in terms of specification with the 0.5G pieces (other= =20 than the size). > Try slowing down the memory timing parameters in BIOS (should look > like 8-5-3-3 or something like that; larger numbers are slower). I have not messed about with the memory timing jumpers at all as far as I c= an=20 recall. The timing setting is the OEM's defaults (Compaq) and there is no = way=20 to access them in the BIOS. memtest86+ reports: Chipset: Intel i915P/G (ECC: Disabled) - FSB: 200MHz - Type: DDR1 Settings: RAM: 200MHz (DDR400) / CAS: 3-3-3-8 / Dual Channel (Interleaved) PS. memtest86+ did not show any errors for 4 passes. This script did not= =20 come up with any errors either: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/memtest.shtml =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart2109767.HUeP3s9o77 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk5Q/BQACgkQVTDTR3kpaLZmKwCfSYmjFdxWcCEHQZJp+8BXpi6B OD4An0KKZyVrM44CQ51zGUtWzeIV0tCv =U4lT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2109767.HUeP3s9o77--