From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-127142-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1QulBB-0005rX-JO
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:01:37 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1EFE21C24D;
Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:01:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F27021C23E
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:59:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so3558353wyg.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 05:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
bh=oxGny/dd72ia9Qz8/LBJF7PbCq6v8EOU/z43IFPqGZY=;
b=OApr3wlSQaFd3t8ycSxkazRcFhhUTyx9VEPdHWd+KZuJQNjSPpHbfWhYwnijON856B
eIeJzCVMt35VXV6HjqKKJau+vc90v9RMN3vHeftMRXOTxzs0Ih7+n+Y1uTpnMIV1Mi3b
4ckuQA8KZ18TgbdGKK8X57201q8hJH0Y1Lgfo=
Received: by 10.227.28.4 with SMTP id k4mr401655wbc.21.1313844931188;
Sat, 20 Aug 2011 05:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id et16sm3330321wbb.19.2011.08.20.05.55.29
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sat, 20 Aug 2011 05:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:55:58 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo-r3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <201108191109.34984.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <4E4F74D2.3090809@gmail.com> <2122673.tty0QrPrze@nazgul>
In-Reply-To: <2122673.tty0QrPrze@nazgul>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1378039.CcNmdKjCrk";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201108201356.15303.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 003afc5bb26e136f7ca282f061bac99f
--nextPart1378039.CcNmdKjCrk
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 09:57:46 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sat 20 August 2011 03:48:18 Dale did opine thusly:
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > On Sat 20 August 2011 02:17:06 Dale did opine thusly:
> > >> It was discussed on -dev so far. This is the subject line:
> > >>=20
> > >> "Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper
> > >> initramfs in the handbook?"
> > >>=20
> > >> I think it will apply to /var to at some point. I think it
> > >> sucks. I have /var on a separate partition and want to put
> > >> /usr on one to but not now.
> > >=20
> > > Eh? That's fucking braindead. It also violates everything udev
> > > ever intended to do.
> > >=20
> > > /usr and /var on separate partitions, plus a custom kernel
> > > without an initramfs is *exactly* the most common use case for
> > > Gentoo....
> >=20
> > I wish you could convince the devs of that. I already have /var on
> > its own and was planning to put /usr on its own. I'm not now tho.
> > Looks like /, /boot, /home and that's it for the OS part. It
> > downright sucks.
> >=20
> > You planning to explain this to the devs? Maybe you will have
> > better luck. They said it is a dev from Fedora that started this .
> > . . . crap. ;-)
>=20
> I'll spend some time I don't have reading the archives, then see.
The very reason I use Gentoo is BECAUSE I don't like RHL. :(
I still have to use CentOS on a server and curse every time it won't work l=
ike=20
Gentoo. Can't they just leave us alone?
=2D-=20
Regards,
Mick
--nextPart1378039.CcNmdKjCrk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk5Pru8ACgkQVTDTR3kpaLZa3QCg5DxguGvbq7KPNxmSG4E2b8mZ
sjwAnR2ZDB+iAO3Df3IgP067a4o5MI45
=GEIz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1378039.CcNmdKjCrk--