From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QkWMj-0007lx-FS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 07:11:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A41C221C143; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 07:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F4B21C022 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 07:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AACE80494 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 08:10:11 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 08:10:04 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.0 and oldconfig Message-ID: <20110723081004.5e59dc3a@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4E2A65EF.3060707@gmail.com> References: <4E29FF8B.5040400@gmail.com> <4E2A0AD6.30009@gmail.com> <1311386666.1574607.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4E2A65EF.3060707@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9cvs36 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/cMoBM.j/zkn9P0uw09AOdHk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 4d16a73b36e5e8c13935707b34722ea7 --Sig_/cMoBM.j/zkn9P0uw09AOdHk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:10:55 -0500, Dale wrote: > I was hoping since it was a whole different numbering scheme that it > was a major change. That was the reason for my question. I didn't > know if this was major or a normal update or something else. I was > hoping for something like when Seamonkey went from version 1.* to 2.* > but this is not the case. The reason I was hoping for this was because > of my kernel panic issue. I'm still hopeful that something may have > been updated that will fix my problem but I'm not as hopeful now since > this is nothing great. While your problem is major to you, the cause and solution are likely quite minor, an out of the way bug in a driver that requires your talents to discover :) --=20 Neil Bothwick A friend of mine sent me a postcard with a satellite photo of the entire planet on it, and on the back he wrote, "Wish you were here." --Sig_/cMoBM.j/zkn9P0uw09AOdHk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4qc9IACgkQum4al0N1GQNfLACfV29vT7qm8RPxS0wZzHBU9wDb DoAAoKfg9MV6bp2BCBXr6KgXgOTXDgig =xNRO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/cMoBM.j/zkn9P0uw09AOdHk--