From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QjZnP-000657-Fk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:38:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6842721C567; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A51A21C55A for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B67B280486 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:37:38 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:37:32 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: evdev broken? Message-ID: <20110720173732.3e1d62b9@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <201107200705.20857.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9cvs36 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/ScuhRKdcOwYoSeBwoeHkR5Q"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 9d6b00b6dc88f5b438c019477112b7f5 --Sig_/ScuhRKdcOwYoSeBwoeHkR5Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:16:06 +0000 (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: > > Every time after you emerge xorg you're meant to remerge its drivers > > (evdev being one of them). Usually there is some elog message > > telling you to run qfile to find what is need to be reinstalled: > > > > qlist -I -C x11-drivers/ =20 >=20 > I've always wondered why, if portage knows that has to be done, can't > portage just go ahead and do it? Now that we have a set to do this, I see no reason why this could not be an option, enabled by a USE flag. --=20 Neil Bothwick COMMAND: A suggestion made to a computer. --Sig_/ScuhRKdcOwYoSeBwoeHkR5Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4nBFEACgkQum4al0N1GQPHUwCfbWKwWadl024pBCAyJLa4XUiZ d1AAn3g0aqA5IkQrCGv9IRaxwFVln39w =AysE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ScuhRKdcOwYoSeBwoeHkR5Q--