From: meino.cramer@gmx.de
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Time for hardware upgrade(s)
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 03:34:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110703013430.GI3049@solfire> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E0FB742.6070309@gmail.com>
Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> [11-07-03 03:08]:
> Grant wrote:
> >>>Is Nvidia still the way to go instead of ATI? I use the nouveau
> >>>drivers with my onboard Nvidia chipset now and they've been fine for
> >>>the most part. I use a threaded ffmpeg to decode HD video instead
> >>>of
> >>>VDPAU so I don't bother with nvidia-drivers.
> >>>
> >>>- Grant
> >>>
> >>I don't have any experience with ATI but I still use Nvidia and their
> >>drivers. I haven't had any problems as of yet. I did have a video
> >>problem
> >>once but it was a kernel problem. For me, I see no need in me
> >>getting a ATI
> >>card. That's just me.
> >>
> >>Dale
> >>
> >I've just read that Nvidia no longer makes onboard video. Has anyone
> >else heard that?
> >
> >Are server motherboard more reliable?
> >
> >- Grant
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> I looked around on newegg and found that there are several mobos that
> have Nvidia video built in. It seems they do still make them. I'm not
> sure if the video or mobos are any that you would like but they are
> being made at least.
>
> Me, I tend to buy video cards. They have upgrade options without
> having to put in a new mobo. YMMV tho.
>
> No idea on server boards. I would think they would be more reliable
> tho.
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
>
I prefer overclocker boards and dont overclock them. Most of them
have a better heat dissipation and the PCB has a better layout
HF-wise.
Only my two cent...you currency may vary ;)
Best regards
mcc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-03 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-02 15:41 [gentoo-user] {OT} Time for hardware upgrade(s) Grant
2011-07-02 18:06 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant
2011-07-02 19:36 ` Dale
2011-07-02 19:59 ` Grant
2011-07-03 0:26 ` Dale
2011-07-03 1:32 ` Grant
2011-07-03 2:50 ` Dale
2011-07-03 3:23 ` Grant
2011-07-03 1:34 ` meino.cramer [this message]
2011-07-03 2:36 ` Dale
2011-07-02 21:54 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-07-02 19:42 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2011-07-02 22:22 ` Grant
2011-07-03 1:26 ` meino.cramer
2011-07-03 1:47 ` JD
2011-07-03 4:06 ` meino.cramer
2011-07-03 6:17 ` [gentoo-user] " pk
2011-07-04 16:30 ` Grant
2011-07-04 17:01 ` Dale
2011-07-04 19:21 ` pk
2011-07-04 20:32 ` Grant
2011-07-05 4:39 ` pk
2011-07-05 13:57 ` Michael Orlitzky
2011-07-06 18:54 ` Grant
2011-07-06 19:08 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-07-06 19:15 ` Grant
2011-07-07 11:13 ` Stroller
2011-07-09 23:10 ` Grant
2011-07-10 0:20 ` Dale
2011-07-10 21:15 ` Grant
2011-07-10 22:22 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-07-05 15:49 ` Bill Longman
2011-07-05 9:54 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-07-20 18:49 ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-07-20 21:43 ` Bill Longman
2011-07-04 22:56 ` [gentoo-user] " masterprometheus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110703013430.GI3049@solfire \
--to=meino.cramer@gmx.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox