From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-124911-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QbAqa-0000nS-0a
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:23:24 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12C451C035;
	Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:21:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from internet.com.uy (correo.tecnet.com.uy [200.40.123.42])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDB51C035
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:21:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from acme7.acmenet (r190-134-27-20.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy [190.134.27.20])
	by correo.tecnet.com.uy (8.14.4/8.14.4/host-001) with ESMTP id p5RCLbp8005999
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:21:37 -0300
X-TN_STAT: 25
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:21:37 -0300
From: luis jure <ljc@internet.com.uy>
To: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] zlib and WOFF
Message-ID: <20110627092137.3014e33d@acme7.acmenet>
In-Reply-To: <9F11097A-F0FD-4DA9-8C9E-6FCA5DAA5D11@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
References: <20110424010757.172dc29d@acme7.acmenet>
	<20110507105859.GC8619@nibiru.local>
	<20110507223153.38acacb5@acme7.acmenet>
	<9F11097A-F0FD-4DA9-8C9E-6FCA5DAA5D11@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (correo.tecnet.com.uy [200.40.123.43]); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:21:37 -0300 (UYT)
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: d31ef9ba2900c0ea1361fd7418b7b403

on 2011-06-26 at 22:06 Stroller wrote:

>This isn't the best fix, IMO. 

i completely agree. by "solution" i meant a quick and dirty fix that
allowed me in the short term to build lilypond.

>IMO the correct fix for this is:

yes, i tried emerging fontforge with the patch you proposed and after that
lilypond compiled OK. thanks!!!


>Finally, report your success at bug 367425.

done.

thank you!