From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qab3h-0002Hm-RK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 22:10:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 074B41C01D for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 22:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD331C01C for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 21:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyh22 with SMTP id 22so903918wyh.40 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 14:34:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=8gDubS7mbDEXw7WNa8vWGVE+voZBtMePKXoNIL2ihVY=; b=NP6Ol7z0wKny5t/ytqqB4OpRysDn/Z6l6njYA67AuRdX9m68BSjJBYKUQmvrcYJazx TYZDmvmm4BuhFUOeg856xb0YiFy59dKR6IjEpUbD84AQXNdmoENFl3A4M8GdMW2DxL0S g0LvIZ3yS4hzJ7BYId2xCSxFhIQzGyVIRDB0w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=Woj08R0U4Zs5gMyg2JIqW3OWnupGWimF5dLL2yYsoC7gQPIGMgMA7wcQhAux+H2vic AMWpoyt6v1lMu8/TybMRv4b6GXsAdtj7KvYFEQ+EotfqSKLURimrCgPspEDaiA5tc5Xl 4DjyHnMC6RsmVs6+RwFuQbIt6YHpjfIdOXeTA= Received: by 10.227.39.93 with SMTP id f29mr4338847wbe.16.1309037655555; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 14:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fr17sm2956592wbb.57.2011.06.25.14.34.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 25 Jun 2011 14:34:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 22:34:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38-gentoo-r6; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <2211928.F2exzk2evu@nazgul> <4E063AF6.4090708@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E063AF6.4090708@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart65461992.dInK1SUYeC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106252234.57815.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 0b3ff98be968f2862ff75cc50928fd07 --nextPart65461992.dInK1SUYeC Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 25 Jun 2011 20:45:58 Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Feedback from the consumer end of the producer-consumer link :-) > >=20 > > The motivation is fine and well, it didn't quite work out, we call > > this a "bug". > >=20 > > The only real mistake was trying to slipstream it in without > > notification or warning. devs all agree we should never do this, but > > it is so ... tempting. > >=20 > > I've made the same mistake myself many many times, and each time it > > came back and bit me hard :-) >=20 > What I like is the speed it got corrected. People that don't sync often > most likely didn't even know it ever changed. >=20 > Another like, a dev that at least reads some of this stuff on -user. > It's a good way to get feedback. If you change something and it doesn't > get mentioned, most likely all is well. If it does get mentioned, may > want to rethink the change. >=20 > Lessons learned the hard way are the ones we remember the longest. ;-) I am getting confused: $ euse -I fortran global use flags (searching: fortran) ************************************************************ [+ D ] fortran - Adds support for fortran (formerly f77) Installed packages matching this USE flag:=20 sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5 local use flags (searching: fortran) ************************************************************ no matching entries found Two days ago or so, virtual fortran installed itself. A day later it=20 uninstalled itself. Now fortran is set in USE as default. I don't know if the film I was watching on TV about aliens has something to= do=20 with this, but I seem to have lost some time ... ;-) =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart65461992.dInK1SUYeC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk4GVIEACgkQVTDTR3kpaLZqGQCffOASH8cpkbkpfZhXO1kxmsUl o/wAoPGZPUtwPAVYPjvpAGD9ShVjtz21 =2xVj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart65461992.dInK1SUYeC--