From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QaROj-0006N5-MJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:51:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EB551C07A; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD211C07A for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05D5A80464 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:48:31 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:48:29 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Message-ID: <20110625124829.3b9e05a8@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4E055608.4060800@gmail.com> References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <6517863.YlIiSIDa8W@pc> <4E04ECE0.9010109@gmail.com> <1466587.PvB50u6JAg@pc> <4E04F91C.8070902@gmail.com> <20110624232018.03c2a706@digimed.co.uk> <4E055608.4060800@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9cvs27 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_//QrIi9Pm_UI0.4WM1v1kYfX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e8e24c93738d648ef418fb1612929d54 --Sig_//QrIi9Pm_UI0.4WM1v1kYfX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:29:12 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> I guess my first post was correct after all. Enable fortran USE flag > >> and keep things as it was before it got changed. It was working > >> fine.=20 > > Isn't that flag enabled by default? All you have yo do is not disable > > it. > You seem to have forgot the dev had changed it. Since it got noticed=20 > and all the dev changed it back in about a day or so. So, it was=20 > enabled, got disabled by a dev then got enabled again by the same dev. =20 ISTR reading some mention of that. Do you mean the profile was changed? That sounds a bit naughty, changing a profile should be done on a version bump IMO. --=20 Neil Bothwick We are sorry, but the number you have dialed is imaginary. --Sig_//QrIi9Pm_UI0.4WM1v1kYfX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4Fyw0ACgkQum4al0N1GQMc4QCgtPbEY44OdxSAhzV/kb2Ivzbw aH4AoMZ85otfvpE3OeG+xCNM8nlUH1OJ =tP1I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_//QrIi9Pm_UI0.4WM1v1kYfX--