From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QaEm7-0006sB-2F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:22:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71F9C1C023; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052A31C023 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0CE380483 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:17:48 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:17:47 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Message-ID: <20110624231747.1165a5a9@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4E048DA5.6060609@coolmail.se> References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <4E0376AE.3080905@coolmail.se> <20110623191608.1696dbc1@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <2041231.8YkDbPZmLp@nazgul> <4E045060.9020706@coolmail.se> <20110624103126.04ef49d5@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <4E048DA5.6060609@coolmail.se> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9cvs27 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/dQpOMUVagT8kA0D=ovQ7ngy"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 6b8671f28dbb0989f80ea65e71e00321 --Sig_/dQpOMUVagT8kA0D=ovQ7ngy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:14:13 +0200, pk wrote: > > To both of you, let me introduce you to the concept of sarcasm... =20 >=20 > Oh well... I'm not entirely unfamiliar with that concept, although I > admit that it escaped me this time. Perhaps, it has something to do with > how it was presented? ;-) sarcasm is pointless when presented like this. --=20 Neil Bothwick ERROR #0915: MONITOR NOT PRESENT. CLICK ON OK TO CONTINUE. --Sig_/dQpOMUVagT8kA0D=ovQ7ngy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4FDQsACgkQum4al0N1GQNusACgzjoGr5AyQpNmPMnjhlw+e9GR scAAn29shTKB9Avj6GPLKbvXrG/R6hFr =O0S2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/dQpOMUVagT8kA0D=ovQ7ngy--