From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QaEda-0006CV-8g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:14:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBD4C1C0D6; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808611C0D6 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 828D280483 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:10:35 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:10:34 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Message-ID: <20110624231034.6fda659a@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <0694AAD4-23E8-4BB8-BDB1-D5BE6CB66B7C@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <4E01CF99.1070109@gmail.com> <20110622141242.7453a8e3@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <4E01EDAF.60608@gmail.com> <20110624000130.GB18036@waltdnes.org> <20110624011411.495fb6e8@digimed.co.uk> <0694AAD4-23E8-4BB8-BDB1-D5BE6CB66B7C@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9cvs27 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/G=uQ0g71vD=qiVfac6SEJof"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 44a7481d8580ad86ea9778ddd6f0d649 --Sig_/G=uQ0g71vD=qiVfac6SEJof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:56:48 +0100, Stroller wrote: > >> 1) what's the difference between "package.keywords" and > >> "package.accept_keywords"? =20 > >=20 > > The latter is the new name for the former. =20 >=20 > So I can just > `mv /etc/portage/package.keywords /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords` > and nothing will break? Yes, but don't ask me what happens if you have both files. It's a more logical name, because it contains per-package overrides for ACCEPT_KEYWORDS, so it now follows the same naming convention as the other package.* files. --=20 Neil Bothwick This is the day for firm decisions! Or is it? --Sig_/G=uQ0g71vD=qiVfac6SEJof Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4FC1oACgkQum4al0N1GQO7/ACgyftSyeXf5kxAjRO2x/ciYgz9 VCMAn0ku1jp0uafRJnQH3yYv5SEweZiz =bdGd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/G=uQ0g71vD=qiVfac6SEJof--