From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QaEb3-00060R-Ir for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:11:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34D9F1C076; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C282D1C076 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7BF480483 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:08:35 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:08:34 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Message-ID: <20110624230834.7fadecd7@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <8B16F832-5585-4FE8-8A51-159FDE0E0FBE@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <20110622171856.2cca9be4@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <4E022A8F.8090403@gmail.com> <201106232227.54084.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <20110623225716.634306c5@digimed.co.uk> <8B16F832-5585-4FE8-8A51-159FDE0E0FBE@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9cvs27 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/juh7paYRD4I..QgSar3LJNM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 06d43daa9e8370fe00bf1a756a6d1b00 --Sig_/juh7paYRD4I..QgSar3LJNM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:02:23 +0100, Stroller wrote: > I like the idea of package.use as a directory of indie files, but > haven't bothered switching over because this works so well for me. The > package.use directory system seems too simple to be true - is it really > no more complex than a directory of any-named files of the same format? Yes. --=20 Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 3: Working vacation --Sig_/juh7paYRD4I..QgSar3LJNM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4FCuIACgkQum4al0N1GQN8ZwCgnsp3KhpICviyO4rA33gwMD0k WygAoL/egD8JmCkD1QuJd+INT8NP0b33 =IeGw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/juh7paYRD4I..QgSar3LJNM--