From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZsVk-00016c-F8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:36:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CED9C1C038; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759BB1C038 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693CEDEC88 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:30:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6yQtD0FcWAZy for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:30:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from wstn.localnet (unknown [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CC0DEC86 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:30:05 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey Organization: at home To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:30:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38-gentoo-r6; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <20110622212816.GB20163@ns1.bonedaddy.net> <4E026E39.6040802@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E026E39.6040802@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106232330.04283.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 3a4036885d5cf3b5430feaa6e5dc7c87 On Wednesday 22 June 2011 23:35:37 Dale wrote: > Maybe we have something different then. I don't have blas-reference on > here anymore either. My point was, disabling fortran to remove it only > lead to other stuff being required. I think there is more on here now > than there was before. So, removing fortran to get rid of bloat didn't > help any because it just required a different set of bloat. Maybe it's time to make a backup, then remove all USE flags from make.conf and package.use, set your profile to default/linux//10.0/desktop/kde and rebuild. Alan and Neil's idea of a set of the meta-packages you want sounds good to me too. Then you'll really have a clean system. I may follow suit - I built this system with kde-meta for simplicity, but of course it now has a lot of stuff I don't want, including Fortran. I tried rebuilding with -fortran as I said a few minutes ago, but portage wanted ifc instead. -- Rgds Peter