public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage getting mixed up with USE?
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:06:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110623230600.0a4b2b7c@digimed.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4509993.1vgHhyACcR@nazgul>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1962 bytes --]

On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:38:58 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:

> On Thursday 23 June 2011 08:59:53 Sebastian Beßler did opine thusly:

> > b) it breaks the way portage displays his informations. Without
> > autounmask the display of emerge shows what he is going to do. With
> > autounmask it shows what needs to be done.  
> 
> That is probably the most evil of all your reasons. There's an old dev 
> joke about The Law Of Unintended Consequences, and it applies here - 
> portage is now suddenly doing something new and 180 different from 
> what it used to do. The normal response if "WTF?" followed by lots of 
> indignation

Ah, the old "we do it that way because that's the way it's always been
done" argument. Yes, it is different, yes, it may be confusing when you
first encounter the change - but that doesn't make it bad.

> > c) it is a big change that came wihout any warning

Apart from the elog messages?

> > d) it is an automation, and because of that a red flag for any "real
> > gentoo user" :-D

What are you talking about? The default setting only displays the changes
that need to be made, there is no automation. You need to enable a
setting, one that only an idiot would enable without adding --ask too,
before anything is automatically written to a file.

> I agree, it's all bad.

Here's the change:

Old way: Portage complained about a flag or mask setting that needed to
be changed. You changed it and tried again. Portage complained about
another change it needed. Rinse and repeat until either all requirements
are satisfied or you give up in disgust.

New way: Portage gives you a list of all the changes that need to be made
and lets you either make them yourself or tells you about an option to
have it do it for you.

I thought even Gentoo users believed in letting the computer do all the
tedious works, otherwise they'd be running LFS.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

UNILINGUAL: American.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-23 22:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-22  8:18 [gentoo-user] portage getting mixed up with USE? Alan McKinnon
2011-06-22  8:49 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2011-06-22  9:15   ` Alan McKinnon
2011-06-22  9:31     ` Daniel Pielmeier
2011-06-22  9:50       ` Alan McKinnon
2011-06-22  9:47 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-06-22  9:53   ` Alan McKinnon
2011-06-22 10:43     ` Neil Bothwick
2011-06-22 11:54       ` Alan McKinnon
2011-06-22 12:22         ` Daniel Pielmeier
2011-06-22 12:41           ` Alan McKinnon
2011-06-22 14:19             ` Mick
2011-06-22 14:44             ` Neil Bothwick
2011-06-22 15:31               ` Alan McKinnon
2011-06-22 16:05                 ` Mick
2011-06-22 16:22                 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-06-22 16:30                 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-06-22 16:59                   ` Alan McKinnon
2011-06-23 11:31                   ` Daniel Pielmeier
2011-06-23 19:40                     ` Alan McKinnon
2011-06-22 17:11                 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-06-22 18:22                   ` Dale
2011-06-22 19:16                     ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-06-22 20:12                       ` Alan McKinnon
2011-06-22 22:35                         ` Mick
2011-06-22 22:58                       ` Neil Bothwick
2011-06-23  1:35                         ` Matthew Finkel
2011-06-23  6:59                         ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-06-23 19:38                           ` Alan McKinnon
2011-06-23 22:06                             ` Neil Bothwick [this message]
2011-06-23 22:31                               ` Alan McKinnon
2011-06-23 22:56                                 ` Mike Edenfield
2011-06-24  0:05                                   ` Neil Bothwick
2011-06-24  0:10                                 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-06-24  8:00                                   ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-06-23 20:05                           ` Yohan Pereira
2011-06-24  8:11                             ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-06-22 10:48   ` Daniel Pielmeier
2011-06-22 11:57     ` Alan McKinnon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110623230600.0a4b2b7c@digimed.co.uk \
    --to=neil@digimed.co.uk \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox