From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZruC-0005pf-2J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:57:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34C541C09E; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D671C09E for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (yooden.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FEAA8047E for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:52:47 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:52:41 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Message-ID: <20110623225241.1faf7734@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1495169.845KSzWzGS@nazgul> References: <3788690.KUE4u0ROPA@nazgul> <20110623213521.3b19adc3@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <1495169.845KSzWzGS@nazgul> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9cvs27 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/d=2v4fkNmIjnv=vmO7cfswM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: d2125d59dc60e9ed459bee4ef482be50 --Sig_/d=2v4fkNmIjnv=vmO7cfswM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:06:28 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > I do similar, except I'm even more of a control freak than you, so > > my kde4 set contains onl;y a couple of meta-packages, the rest it > > individual packages. > >=20 > > % wc -l /etc/portage/sets/kde4 > > 83 /etc/portage/sets/kde4 > >=20 > > Sad, I know :( =20 >=20 > Wow, how do you maintain that lot and keep it all straight? >=20 > KDE devs love adding and removing and renaming stuff between minor=20 > versions, mostly just for the hell of it. You could end up with=20 > KDE-4.2 packages in there if you don't keep an eye on it :-) The KDE ebuilds barf if you try to mix versions, if a package is removed or renamed from a later release, portage lets me know! If means I don't get to know about any new additions, but I can read about those on kde.org --=20 Neil Bothwick You have the capacity to learn from mistakes. You'll learn a lot today. --Sig_/d=2v4fkNmIjnv=vmO7cfswM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4Dta4ACgkQum4al0N1GQNz5ACcC9xNXelj++aobJAbWF8jFXaF JdQAnRRoOurcpnsbv7z2zcCmxcMQK6ES =voe0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/d=2v4fkNmIjnv=vmO7cfswM--