From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZqgz-0006Xk-4o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:40:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 478291C0B5; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61571C0B5 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zaphod.digimed.co.uk (zaphod.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.1]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4AB18047E for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:35:30 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:35:21 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Message-ID: <20110623213521.3b19adc3@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <3788690.KUE4u0ROPA@nazgul> References: <4E031A49.4090009@gmail.com> <20110623130953.6eab58cd@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <3788690.KUE4u0ROPA@nazgul> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9cvs27 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/i.BE8Hft2_OjUZINu40=a/L"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 80a6210f134b3335f75891c9f3d1e91e --Sig_/i.BE8Hft2_OjUZINu40=a/L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:45:36 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > If you consider spending a couple of days farting around with > > fortran to be "much easier"... :P =20 >=20 > I use sets for this. I want KDE but not all of it, so I have a set=20 > with just the -meta packages I want: I do similar, except I'm even more of a control freak than you, so my kde4 set contains onl;y a couple of meta-packages, the rest it individual packages. % wc -l /etc/portage/sets/kde4 83 /etc/portage/sets/kde4 Sad, I know :( --=20 Neil Bothwick A computer scientist is someone who, when told to "Go to Hell," sees the "go to," rather than the destination, as harmful. --Sig_/i.BE8Hft2_OjUZINu40=a/L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4Do5IACgkQum4al0N1GQMxiACdGL9/dWQ0h9wTG5LBW5j6B5g1 lUYAnRkq7g4LOSGynMSkH5J7gwndwFcA =YOVq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/i.BE8Hft2_OjUZINu40=a/L--