From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZqDI-0003Yl-1t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:09:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D24DE1C116; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kcout02.prserv.net (kcout02.prserv.net [12.154.55.32]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2CD1C122 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from topaz.binro.org (host-84-13-213-143.opaltelecom.net[84.13.213.143]) by prserv.net (kcout02) with ESMTP id <2011062320044920200117b4e> (Authid: gbinet.atwoodr); Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:04:49 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [84.13.213.143] Received: from topaz.binro.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by topaz.binro.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5NK4kFw026387 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:04:47 +0100 Received: (from robin@localhost) by topaz.binro.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p5NK4kSX026385 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:04:46 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: topaz.binro.org: robin set sender to robin.atwood@attglobal.net using -f From: Robin Atwood To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:04:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo; KDE/4.6.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <20110623191608.1696dbc1@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <2041231.8YkDbPZmLp@nazgul> In-Reply-To: <2041231.8YkDbPZmLp@nazgul> X-Face: .c^^1Tm5bSr;@/t2T;-0HM`{~wj)F]2C]Zr#!Ig5fi&$LV1E^;5jL{]08F@tj{f3,U( =?utf-8?q?I=5B9=0A=09=3B7R4jB8A7=7Cmw7=7BK=5COYFzCL=5Fe/tAb?=)0_@07[e.}H`OE*na@ =?utf-8?q?7m=3DOp1=2Es0v3=5F3*=7C=3F=23l=7CXD=7Dn*=0A=09ARBV?=@IdaVd!V&bo;Z/TEb}oJi_(}3VOa^tj;$zlk96>K*hb> =?utf-8?q?PYbe6J=60=277qh=60=3Fm!!/k=5Dezl=0A=09=5FVIifMR=234kg*?="'n/S&^4@4: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106232104.46043.robin.atwood@attglobal.net> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 59029a36051825b7ebe52ac93d3c1467 On Thursday 23 Jun 2011, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Thursday 23 June 2011 19:16:08 Neil Bothwick did opine thusly: > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:23:58 +0200, pk wrote: > > > It refuses to die because it's still very useful in certain > > > niche areas (hpc, numerical computing etc.) where "modern" > > > languages doesn't cut it... :-) > > > > Or so the Fortran programmers with jobs to protect will tell you... > > > > You'll be telling us there's still a place for Cobol next :-O > > Of course there's a place for Cobol, a classic one is in the bank my > gf does data warehousing at. > > There's not a single soul in the entire bank that is willing to sign > off on a project to replace the Cobol that has run > justfinethanksverymuch for 25+ years It's the latest thing! http://visualcobol.microfocus.com/ -Robin --