From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZj6m-0005Tf-Kk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:34:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BDE11C154; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns1.bonedaddy.net (ns1.bonedaddy.net [70.91.141.202]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E376C1C154 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns1.bonedaddy.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.bonedaddy.net (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5NC0b4B016300 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:00:37 -0400 Received: (from tgoodman@localhost) by ns1.bonedaddy.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id p5NC0bN3016299 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:00:37 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.bonedaddy.net: tgoodman set sender to tsg@bonedaddy.net using -f Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:00:37 -0400 From: Todd Goodman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Message-ID: <20110623120037.GA30008@ns1.bonedaddy.net> References: <4E01EF3F.8040800@gmail.com> <4E020BA4.50201@gmail.com> <20110622172309.GZ20163@ns1.bonedaddy.net> <4E023128.9040002@gmail.com> <4E0235F6.7090409@gmail.com> <20110622203345.GA20163@ns1.bonedaddy.net> <4E025FEB.8020709@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E025FEB.8020709@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 50939cc51ad3ee2cd71f033c98a63017 * Dale [110622 17:40]: > Todd Goodman wrote: > > * Dale [110622 14:45]: > > > >> > >> When I did that, it complained that cantor was built with no backend. > >> Did you get the same thing? It said this here: > >> > >> WARN (postinst) > >> > >> You have decided to build cantor with no backend. > >> To have this application functional, please do one of below: > >> # emerge -va1 '='kde-base/cantor-4.6.4 with 'R' USE flag enabled > >> # emerge -vaDu sci-mathematics/maxima > >> > >> So, I did the later and it needs to emerge several packages that I > >> didn't have before. Looks like I can either have a bit of bloat on one > >> side or a bit of bloat on the other side. o_O > >> > >> I mention just in case you didn't notice the message and then something > >> borks on next login. > >> > >> Dale > >> > >> :-) :-) > >> > > Yes, it complained about the same thing. Since I don't know what cantor > > is I figure I don't much care if it has a backend or not. :-) > > > > Seriously, I haven't noticed any issues yet not having the backend. > > > > If I find something broken I need then I'll do as you did. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Todd > > > > > > > > root@fireball / # eix cantor > [I] kde-base/cantor > Available versions: (4) 4.6.2{tbz2} 4.6.3{tbz2} (~)4.6.4{tbz2} > {+R aqua debug +handbook kdeenablefinal kdeprefix ps} > Installed versions: 4.6.4(4){tbz2}(01:24:34 PM > 06/22/2011)(handbook -R -aqua -debug -kdeenablefinal -ps) > Homepage: http://www.kde.org/ > Description: KDE4 interface for doing mathematics and > scientific computing > > root@fireball / # > > You may not need it unless you jump into the menu and go to Education > > Mathematics > Cantor. I don't even know how it works so if you are the > same as me, you won't need it. > > Dale > > :-) :-) Yeah, real doubtful as the machine is typically used to remote shell into with a handlful of graphic apps started with a display on the remote machine I'm sshing in from. :-) Thanks, Todd