From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZVTH-00011f-Ao for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:00:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F27F71C029; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:58:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns1.bonedaddy.net (ns1.bonedaddy.net [70.91.141.202]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66E31C029 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:58:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns1.bonedaddy.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.bonedaddy.net (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5MLSG6n006172 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:28:16 -0400 Received: (from tgoodman@localhost) by ns1.bonedaddy.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id p5MLSGW9006171 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:28:16 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.bonedaddy.net: tgoodman set sender to tsg@bonedaddy.net using -f Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:28:16 -0400 From: Todd Goodman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Message-ID: <20110622212816.GB20163@ns1.bonedaddy.net> References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <201106221525.47375.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <4E020F32.1040209@gmail.com> <4E022FFD.3090708@gmail.com> <4E0246FB.2090309@gmail.com> <4E0256B0.4010105@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E0256B0.4010105@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e1a6a55fa3c560f27965a8d731245ab3 * Dale [110622 16:41]: > Matthew Finkel wrote: [...] > > Do correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't blas-reference pulled in by > > merging gcc with USE="fortran"? Or did you install blas-reference for > > another reason? > > > > > > > > > > > No clue. I just -c'd some stuff and kept running revdep-rebuild and > emerge -uvDNa world until it all got sorted. It took a few times but I > finally got a clean result. > > The funny thing is this. I removed about 3 packages but had to install > close to a dozen to satisfy what was missing. Cantore, or something > like that, was left with no backend when I removed R. > > So, removed some bloat then installed some more bloat. Ain't that a peach? > > Dale > > :-) :-) No actually blas-reference fails to build unless gcc is built with the fortran use flag enabled (since there's no fortran compiler available.) The deps pulling in blas-reference are in my previous mail. Todd