From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-124557-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1QZOIT-00052J-Pe
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:20:50 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27EB51C1A4;
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:19:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23771C1D5
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:19:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so779886wyb.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent
:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
bh=KuZfSTr9zpK5eG4pABDIfqBq6Yvqb2DIJL06DURlsks=;
b=bYnHyX6d5CO730TIrnmh9kH2s4IeuHvtRHjgx18w1M9GZLznYrm4zoyJhU+oQgjDKZ
frwNPTsCcnsi7/KZVTB4a8DYL0dNsDnE7la4xfJtrsT7Q4xkbdWMoyjCNnLU7lViX28D
u/1U3u9QVvH6rfG87o947AmXQxRDhJZ+bQ1C0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
b=DLbMNTEsb2PQHBBhUzCB7SwfECmMOGV3Y8XyySgN+MTl0qUwa4+fNQii+tIrg+41dL
FHdsFHVuZgS46fc50YLyWdcqMxwpPKA2dHZ7x71GfEow5lSrKW7NQqLtxbC70bGF7LFO
N0PwrDWhUQEWUO3Pd/ksPerJEctKDQlnY04lk=
Received: by 10.217.1.5 with SMTP id m5mr821413wes.19.1308752361966;
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dell_xps.localnet ([213.123.142.221])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l5sm336158weq.9.2011.06.22.07.19.20
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage getting mixed up with USE?
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:19:52 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38-gentoo-r6; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; )
References: <2869451.8C6Z2vDv6d@nazgul> <BANLkTi=7r6XUMK9TrW+xq85HvwgnZXaFLA@mail.gmail.com> <1670223.3B9JZpE7Ee@nazgul>
In-Reply-To: <1670223.3B9JZpE7Ee@nazgul>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart2326499.NOLr8JQ6pl";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201106221520.03278.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 968a1aff5992f0a3531350156cb4afef
--nextPart2326499.NOLr8JQ6pl
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wednesday 22 Jun 2011 13:41:57 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 June 2011 14:22:00 Daniel Pielmeier did opine thusly:
> > > Portage has always displayed the latter right? That makes sense
> > > - you can see what the emerge command would do as entered and
> > > compare it to the error to see what the problem is. In this
> > > case it's a tweak to package.use which I'm perfectly happy to
> > > do.
> > >=20
> > > I think it's bug time, portage is displaying the wrong output
> > > for
> > > failures.
> >=20
> > You can try if you get the desired output if FEATURES=3D"-autounmask".
> > If you enable autounmask portage automatically enableds the
> > required changes and tells you the changes required to your
> > configuration.
>=20
> It is unset here (well, it's not set, actually - same thing)
>=20
> I'm a sysadmin, I have an inherent distrust of all things software and
> automagic-config-changers are scary things indeed :-)
I'd include eselect in this. There's probably nothing scary about it, but =
it=20
does make me feel nervous when I *have* to use it ... ;-)
=2D-=20
Regards,
Mick
--nextPart2326499.NOLr8JQ6pl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk4B+hMACgkQVTDTR3kpaLai3gCdEh5oeeK0q/Ypzy+DBQggmljv
E5kAni2zet2iaI90zw+wNAKB9nYDd1/b
=l3mh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart2326499.NOLr8JQ6pl--