* [gentoo-user] Can I delete "/usr/lib64/perl5/*_perl/5.12.2/"?
@ 2011-06-09 19:21 Grant
2011-06-09 19:35 ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Grant @ 2011-06-09 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo mailing list
A while back I installed a bundle of perl modules outside of portage.
I never got around to using a cruft script to get rid of them and now
that I've moved from perl-5.12.2 to 5.12.3, I'm thinking it might be
as easy as:
# rm /usr/lib64/perl5/*_perl/5.12.2
Is that safe? Should it eliminate all traces of the stale perl modules?
- Grant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Can I delete "/usr/lib64/perl5/*_perl/5.12.2/"?
2011-06-09 19:21 [gentoo-user] Can I delete "/usr/lib64/perl5/*_perl/5.12.2/"? Grant
@ 2011-06-09 19:35 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-06-09 20:52 ` Mick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2011-06-09 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:21 on Thursday 09 June 2011, Grant did
opine thusly:
> A while back I installed a bundle of perl modules outside of portage.
> I never got around to using a cruft script to get rid of them and now
> that I've moved from perl-5.12.2 to 5.12.3, I'm thinking it might be
> as easy as:
>
> # rm /usr/lib64/perl5/*_perl/5.12.2
>
> Is that safe? Should it eliminate all traces of the stale perl modules?
Yes, that's the way it is done. Also look in /usr/share/{doc|man} and the same
dir structures in /usr/local/
If you run "equery files" on a random bunch of perl ebuilds, you'll see that
most only put files in those perl libs and /usr/share/doc/, so you've probably
got most stuff covered
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Can I delete "/usr/lib64/perl5/*_perl/5.12.2/"?
2011-06-09 19:35 ` Alan McKinnon
@ 2011-06-09 20:52 ` Mick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mick @ 2011-06-09 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 891 bytes --]
On Thursday 09 Jun 2011 20:35:18 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 21:21 on Thursday 09 June 2011, Grant did
>
> opine thusly:
> > A while back I installed a bundle of perl modules outside of portage.
> > I never got around to using a cruft script to get rid of them and now
> > that I've moved from perl-5.12.2 to 5.12.3, I'm thinking it might be
> > as easy as:
> >
> > # rm /usr/lib64/perl5/*_perl/5.12.2
> >
> > Is that safe? Should it eliminate all traces of the stale perl modules?
>
> Yes, that's the way it is done. Also look in /usr/share/{doc|man} and the
> same dir structures in /usr/local/
>
> If you run "equery files" on a random bunch of perl ebuilds, you'll see
> that most only put files in those perl libs and /usr/share/doc/, so you've
> probably got most stuff covered
and don't forget perl-cleaner.
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-09 20:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-09 19:21 [gentoo-user] Can I delete "/usr/lib64/perl5/*_perl/5.12.2/"? Grant
2011-06-09 19:35 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-06-09 20:52 ` Mick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox