From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QUkbA-0002yG-O9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:08:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BE571C1D7; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11D11C1D7 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so109871wwi.4 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:06:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=kdNYVwdYG+2eYE6/XL1HrBIP0hMxbcCki1Lg8Q3FHYk=; b=I3DbvCsI83SJAJYUa5g+h0FSYXEOg8Vt43vnhjjTovgtpz9WALs6uk/j5J+4LqimDc /xkp+FSyQGBYMWGd0Yt3HJqV3IAnRVbXxDJgvahAG8+ZzyjnZ5nBwsNR3ByFQTRrFifl La/+eleLdlLIqEQUNPgoi2PrGEKq3/gZVt7/4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=S77Beyo5ecbJAxEQia2WAOaqOW7QD/bCnv7DpOZcstEeBYtpffmMbnT0rIfXykqCGN YRdT64unkxkB4bdhr/rK1udEYbr+Z/QYT5wNiwcrqb+z+cpiJ1XcIZ9phhWLhcwVg7AI qPYZSMm8BAc31qL2s17OeW48zshrBMYjkzlPU= Received: by 10.227.128.208 with SMTP id l16mr1188822wbs.61.1307646411135; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-183-215.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.183.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fl19sm1448301wbb.32.2011.06.09.12.06.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:06:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel Modules Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:06:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-ck; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <4DF0A5FA.1020602@gmail.com> <201106092018.37311.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <4DF11681.3060908@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4DF11681.3060908@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106092106.11804.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 0ffd77da0d7dbb90232fdb853b0a49c8 Apparently, though unproven, at 20:52 on Thursday 09 June 2011, Bill Longman did opine thusly: > On 06/09/2011 11:18 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > eselect OTOH, is something I always have to run bit by bit to recall the > > invocation. That's just way too much effort for this here old git.... > > Wasn't on this list that I saw the correct procedure for eselect? > > eselect > eselect kernel > eselect kernel list > eselect kernel set 6 > > It's so true.... In my case there's usually a lot of wondering which one it is after step 1. Try this, poke around, nope. Try that, nope not that one. Sometime after the third try I find it. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com