From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QUQt0-00019O-8d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 22:06:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9320B1C0E5; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420231C0E5 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so3918336wwi.4 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:04:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=f1BhYpUktVfA4tZdrp28W8FcUQ3PuCSVRnm6C85gfPo=; b=vrnHp6ynSDLmd6BQP1aT2UuzoZp/2LOhCGWZdj8nm+dMZrCgrqi89GHsl0y56KfiQ6 GbU/d+TDoCSV76ovWY2e0Jq8sdBfdug94b5IDALEn/hP0FR5zpwnbdaEZ8BT3FWGH4iZ U4OdCiU8WeS5PWjzalELX5NWJLy2dFxpv8HB0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=mVTyWj40rICF4wMITWDD0fm6aXp/gKyJwKhE2zk8Om41+L1oADHzkBIm5CGHin5wLi U86ONq1OzvOvMFtFbX2QPkPVoqg7R08K3rggOmsi/WghglZ1EhSP/Fk9EkamACrPTVF6 tHEOsCwQz6gZvpG/OMtNalhPy3Yeom/xjZQFA= Received: by 10.216.69.77 with SMTP id m55mr1390169wed.11.1307570670251; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h22sm524161wes.8.2011.06.08.15.04.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:04:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 23:04:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38-gentoo-r6; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <4DEED011.90907@gmail.com> <3624690.VRYPZsnpLZ@localhost> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1705080.pWzLbRSqyC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106082305.09288.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 4c2ed1ce28102d958189b4cd560445ce --nextPart1705080.pWzLbRSqyC Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 20:51:10 Paul Hartman wrote: > 2011/6/8 Volker Armin Hemmann : > > 1&1: > >=20 > > Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag > > ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4 > > Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag > > ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4 > > Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag > > ok (0.726s) verwende ipv4 > > Test mit Dual Stack und grosse Pakete > > ok (0.665s) verwende ipv4 > > Test IPv4 ohne DNS > > ok (0.417s) verwende ipv4 > > Test IPv6 ohne DNS > > ok (0.440s) verwende ipv6 6to4 > > Test grosse IPv6 Pakete > > ok (0.734s) verwende ipv6 6to4 > > Test ob der DNS server des ISP IPv6 unterst=C3=BCtzt > > bad (1.401s) > >=20 > > as the site explains the dns test is a goodie and failing it is not a b= ig > > deal. >=20 > Charter Communications cable internet: >=20 > Test with IPv4 DNS record > ok (0.580s) using ipv4 > Test with IPv6 DNS record > ok (0.268s) using ipv6 > Test with Dual Stack DNS record > ok (0.256s) using ipv6 > Test for Dual Stack DNS and large packet > ok (0.090s) using ipv6 > Test IPv4 without DNS > ok (0.148s) using ipv4 > Test IPv6 without DNS > ok (0.162s) using ipv6 > Test IPv6 large packet > ok (0.092s) using ipv6 > Test if your ISP's DNS server uses IPv6 > ok (0.316s) using ipv6 >=20 > :) I find this rather confusing! Paul is your ISP offering native IPv6 and if= =20 they do does your router speak ipv6? What does your /etc/resolv.conf show? When I run this test I get: Test with IPv4 DNS record =09 ok (0.552s) using ipv4 Test with IPv6 DNS record =09 bad (0.197s) Test with Dual Stack DNS record =09 ok (0.558s) using ipv4 Test for Dual Stack DNS and large packet =09 ok (0.239s) using ipv4 Test IPv4 without DNS =09 ok (0.368s) using ipv4 Test IPv6 without DNS =09 bad (0.022s) Test IPv6 large packet =09 bad (0.025s) Test if your ISP's DNS server uses IPv6 =09 ok (0.691s) using ipv4 When I run it with Windows 7 I get: Test with IPv4 DNS record =09 ok (0.689s) using ipv4 =20 Test with IPv6 DNS record =09 bad (0.022s) Test with Dual Stack DNS record =09 ok (0.544s) using ipv4 Test for Dual Stack DNS and large packet =20 ok (0.241s) using ipv4 Test IPv4 without DNS =09 ok (0.384s) using ipv4 Test IPv6 without DNS =09 ok (3.593s) using ipv6 Teredo Test IPv6 large packet =09 bad (0.018s) Test if your ISP's DNS server uses IPv6 =20 ok (0.387s) using ipv4=20 =46rom Windows7 I can ping ipv6 addresses (but not domain names) because it= uses=20 Teredo, but from Linux I cannot. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1705080.pWzLbRSqyC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk3v8hUACgkQVTDTR3kpaLZ5+QCgvo+Ogmxm5AFTfGYdXAzKxXfG F+gAnRq+X0pWuGeJm7CiX+apV0MDe5dr =xC2F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1705080.pWzLbRSqyC--