* [gentoo-user] udisks wants to downgrade udev and parted - but why?
@ 2011-06-07 15:36 Helmut Jarausch
2011-06-07 16:07 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-06-07 16:22 ` Daniel Pielmeier
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Helmut Jarausch @ 2011-06-07 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hi,
I'm puzzled again by portage's logic.
When trying to emerge sys-fs/udisks-1.0.2-r4
it wants to downgrade sys-fs/udev from 171 to 168-r2 and
sys-block/parted from 3.0 to 2.4
The udisks' ebuild contains
>=sys-fs/udev-147[extras]
>=sys-block/parted-1.8.8[device-mapper]
sys-fs/udev hasn't an 'extra' use flag and
sys-block/parted-3.0 has been emerged with the device-mapper
use flag.
But why does portage try to downgrade these to packages?
Thanks for shedding some light on this one,
Helmut.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] udisks wants to downgrade udev and parted - but why? 2011-06-07 15:36 [gentoo-user] udisks wants to downgrade udev and parted - but why? Helmut Jarausch @ 2011-06-07 16:07 ` Neil Bothwick 2011-06-07 16:22 ` Daniel Pielmeier 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Neil Bothwick @ 2011-06-07 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 459 bytes --] On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:36:08 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > sys-block/parted-3.0 has been emerged with the device-mapper > use flag. > > But why does portage try to downgrade these to packages? parted 3.0 is now masked, it broke gparted and others # Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org> (5 Jun 2011) # Masked until bug #370163 is resolved. >=sys-block/parted-3.0 -- Neil Bothwick Anything worth fighting for is worth fighting dirty for. [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] udisks wants to downgrade udev and parted - but why? 2011-06-07 15:36 [gentoo-user] udisks wants to downgrade udev and parted - but why? Helmut Jarausch 2011-06-07 16:07 ` Neil Bothwick @ 2011-06-07 16:22 ` Daniel Pielmeier 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Daniel Pielmeier @ 2011-06-07 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 471 bytes --] Helmut Jarausch schrieb am 07.06.2011 17:36: > When trying to emerge sys-fs/udisks-1.0.2-r4 > it wants to downgrade sys-fs/udev from 171 to 168-r2 > > The udisks' ebuild contains >> =sys-fs/udev-147[extras] > > sys-fs/udev hasn't an 'extra' use flag But sys-fs/udev-168-r2 has an extra use flag thus the dependency is satisfied and portage wants to downgrade udev. See bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/348472 for more information. -- Daniel Pielmeier [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-07 16:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-06-07 15:36 [gentoo-user] udisks wants to downgrade udev and parted - but why? Helmut Jarausch 2011-06-07 16:07 ` Neil Bothwick 2011-06-07 16:22 ` Daniel Pielmeier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox