From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QTcqn-0005cu-NI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:40:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E4F6E063D; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:38:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F602E063D for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywl2 with SMTP id 2so2220138ywl.40 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:38:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=7NKjedMp6dU6rz6wmCEFcbJtLc4IZJOodRLgNfndE/0=; b=gJqSAbiTPQ5Mnci7ZbPMVMkMU47dGEjvrZGeAkF4MWO1QiZNUnS3u2jSr5y7RWHLH1 WT14mWhy8K/C42DRjf4DHCS/pflYzYzDP6KiZaFxtN1FIbpjXV/R0nETrtA+3mBNKKgs /U6CCKNd8awYN7mdEYwOpvf35tkqxSrDOfTcQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=bfBWi2FECjE9WBNSkCjz0cQQlmea3SQOAa+vDNTJchf5wwvNTGZmYJg8w1CPHggSXP RzP9oiLq2zKTiTPfzcB36w3ZR1eQ9dKAPxb1kyyPPER9MWrjubwSCwBunrTy1e+1M5Y3 2qS/LP12CVFWqlyfg+mFPRXjPwiaOUN11GNo4= Received: by 10.236.189.2 with SMTP id b2mr6379015yhn.388.1307378295488; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gaurahari.merseine.nu (adsl-72-152-83-64.asm.bellsouth.net [72.152.83.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n29sm3336626yhj.40.2011.06.06.09.38.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:38:08 -0400 From: Indi To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: thunderbird "fixed" folders? [SOLVED] Message-ID: <20110606163808.GA17926@gaurahari.merseine.nu> References: <20110606122601.GA3191@gaurahari.merseine.nu> <4DECC9DF.1080207@libertytrek.org> <20110606124446.GD3191@gaurahari.merseine.nu> <4DECDA75.30001@darkmetatron.de> <20110606142448.GG3191@gaurahari.merseine.nu> <4DECE530.5020901@darkmetatron.de> <20110606144820.GI3191@gaurahari.merseine.nu> <4DECEB2F.3040202@darkmetatron.de> <20110606111817.3688038f@gaurahari.merseine.nu> <4DECF20E.1060902@darkmetatron.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DECF20E.1060902@darkmetatron.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: adb9ae3a74f1c2e1e7d3b15669491f67 On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:28:14PM +0200, Sebastian Be=DFler wrote: > Am 06.06.2011 17:18, schrieb Indi: >=20 > > Maybe we should also both remember that I *am* running ~x86? > > :) >=20 > That should make now difference, my girlfriend uses ~x86 on her laptop > and there thunderbird reads and applies the userChrome.css just like > here with my ~amd64 thunderbird. >=20 > The programmcode for 32bit and 64bit thunderbird is for all parts that > has to do with chrome-rendering absolut the same. >=20 BTW, the testing I did was with version 3.1.10, and with portage building it, rather than using thunderbird-bin. The version of=20 xulrunner is 2.0.1-r1i, which seems to be working just fine with=20 both firefox and conkeror (no, I don't mean "konqueror"). Just in case anyone's keeping score and needs the info. --=20 klaatu virada nicto