From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QSDSY-0005qr-6h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:21:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C61091C228; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2F81C228 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so1226406wyi.40 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:15:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=o5MJB8zmxlmt5GkiUuh90r4HkMMqvrXttCj3gpvI2lM=; b=uL6BQaWU7ebPecyEpijKTtPWZlqMdOESv188BaQK6Dzxq1yEoJXQk94iDYh2e82Ti1 0LRRk4JfoUrga/TnHgqlTEKpOJOzFp8jkffpDr8nNbJuS5jKrVZ64vJdPp0jxCLKEEEf A60++yNjAs1MNqTE3sg69jAkkpZgd5e8uY7PQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=RdcgkyxkhkB5YYIGXmvmC0nNLfBeX4rVM3G7HhqHT0+ZhyiGKMfx60rllLBdEUOJxo if+AG7tOdCSD0YQHFZVfySMJ9e4U7Txwj4tdUcpsANhaVl3+uTasiLCh5p5RjOsRXs0j PBVHTE8SFWsWsOs1JalSQxP0tFYNpiCcXlYQU= Received: by 10.227.57.81 with SMTP id b17mr1045444wbh.98.1307042159717; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:15:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-215-91-253.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.215.91.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o19sm570527wbh.38.2011.06.02.12.15.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:15:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] chrome and everything Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:15:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-ck; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <201106021121.52021.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <201106022115.17742.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e90cfb158378f9fa72abd25c372bbfc1 Apparently, though unproven, at 14:27 on Thursday 02 June 2011, Andr=C3=A1= s Cs=C3=A1nyi=20 did opine thusly: > On 2 June 2011 11:21, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> While I wrote this letter Chromium become crazy again - thanks the > >> automatic save few words has lost this letter - and I know that the > >> root cause the Chromium itself and the flash isn't matter. Flash jus= t > >> make faster that process when Chromium become crazy. > >=20 > > No, you are probably wrong here. > >=20 > > Chromium is not the problem, Flash is the problem. > >=20 > > Flash is a piece of shit that has never worked right and Adobe are a > > bunch of fools that cannot code properly or securely. I can comfortab= ly > > say this based on long hard bitter experience by the entire Linux > > community. > >=20 > > If you choose to use Flash, you get to put up with the resulting > > problems. >=20 > I agree flash is a piece of shit. Only that fact annoys me when the > browser (Chromium) going to crash the half of my system crashes as > well. I can accept the fact sometimes I have to restart the browser. I > did it few times on Windows, as well, because of flash. I can't accept > that when the browser crashes because of flash I have to restart my > computer. >=20 > Why die another applications if the browser crashes? For example > console stuffs as htop, grep, less and others? Harmed seriously the > graphic abilities of the system in this case? I can't fix Adobe for you. I'd like to, but can't. You have essentially two choices: 1. Don't use flash. 2. Use flash and put up with what it does. Or try various versions to fin= d one=20 that sucks less. You really have no other choice in the short term. There is one medium term option you may want to pursue, to persuade Adobe= to=20 write nice good clean code. A lot of people will be very happy if you suc= ceed.=20 Which doesn't actually do much about your immediate problem. --=20 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com