From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QSDfK-0008JI-O1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:34:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 326A81C047; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D553A1C047 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so1245073wyi.40 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:33:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=2nlrPogZM3mUFn9mKweSK3y8jTOgASp7h3R/LwYzOdE=; b=bp8WKUZu9zUv5QXr/I0CPL3NYOAwNdym+KMq7kSINjqcMWm9oPp0oDTakBlnq2ovFM ZUOwkz+BAL9pS2w91VLtcbXdzH1rEnD5wMfD5GFfYBETcQFYCT2FXb2JSwcwpOagmv+7 DfGlxrzhBBAvEZognMNBCwMi09K/X9Sz2OnyM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=bJTfV/uiaQFIb5XZIP2gzVWq0EBh0L/yjaP1EfIJ8lhgrXLKiLb9EViI0rzfAZxgHU VuMuM4a9bIvCpNgdesvK0bDuDQRa5e7Gv1miVbLfxAczmD6XrFgy/TXzx3u6Phww/Bbf VcM2nZxN7grvJVy8AoLMyu0hG3AqsHbGdXygM= Received: by 10.227.197.199 with SMTP id el7mr1064163wbb.32.1307043203006; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o19sm582488wbh.4.2011.06.02.12.33.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:33:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:33:48 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38-gentoo-r6; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <20110602152217.44ba8be6@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2377953.NjGsH0cYUE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106022034.00463.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f3ee0a67411cf44083d0f54827400532 --nextPart2377953.NjGsH0cYUE Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 02 Jun 2011 15:40:17 Doug Hunley wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:22, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:18:36 -0400, Indi wrote: > >> There've been times I'd have liked a simple > >> inventory of all files relating to a package after unmerging it, > >> like "warning -- the following files are associated with [pkg] > >> but will not be automatically removed due to having been modified". > >=20 > > That sounds like a good idea for a default inclusion in pkg_postrm() so > > the information would end up wherever you sent elog messages. >=20 > +1 to this. I'd find that very handy. +1 It'll be a nice check of a failing memory (did I do what?!) or finding out = if=20 you'd been hacked ... :)) =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart2377953.NjGsH0cYUE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk3n5agACgkQVTDTR3kpaLZuVgCglXTKAjOniz+Ml+x6YduWrGKz UHsAn2qa9vaXgY0MMQIgkgvCwZMrVXbf =mFLo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2377953.NjGsH0cYUE--